welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Gregory William Coleman
Gregory William Coleman
Gregory William Coleman
Visitors: 53
0
Bar #846831(FL)     License for 34 years; Member in Good Standing
West Palm Beach FL

Are you Gregory William Coleman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

SC15-824  In Re: Amendments to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar - Standards for Board Certification in Condominium and Planned Development Law  (2016)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 21, 2016
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC15-824 _ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR—STANDARDS FOR BOARD CERTIFICATION IN CONDOMINIUM AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LAW. [January 21, 2016] PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar petitions this Court to amend the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The Florida Bar (Bar) has submitted a petition out of its biennial cycle proposing that chapter 6 (Legal Specialization and Education Programs) of the Rules..
SC15-601  In Re: Amendments to Rule of The Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to The Bar 1-22.2  (2015)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC15-601 _ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT RELATING TO ADMISSIONS TO THE BAR 1-22.2. [October 22, 2015] PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court for consideration of an amendment to the Rule of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar 1-22.2 (Attorney Members; Appointments) proposed by the Florida Board of Bar Examiners (Board). See Fla. Bar Admiss. R. 1-12.1 We have jurisdiction2 and amend the rule as proposed. 1. The Florida Bar was gr..
SC14-2126  In Re: Amendments to Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 4-7.22 - Lawyer Referral Services  (2015)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Sep. 24, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC14-2126 _ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 4-7.22—LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES. [September 24, 2015] PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar petitions this Court to amend Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-7.22 (Lawyer Referral Services). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. Over the years, for-profit lawyer referral services in Florida have been considered questionable because they generate money for the owner of the service through referrals of..
SC14-2088  In Re: Amendments to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (Biennial Petition)  (2015)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 11, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC14-2088 _ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR (BIENNIAL PETITION). [June 11, 2015] PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court on the petition of The Florida Bar proposing amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Bar Rules). See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 1-12.1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The Bar’s petition in this case proposes amendments to the following Bar Rules: 1-3.3 (Official Bar Name and Contact Inform..
75-74-Cr-CA  United States v. Visuna  (1975)
District Court, S.D. Florida Filed: May 09, 1975 Citations: 395 F. Supp. 352
395 F. Supp. 352 (1975) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lazaro VISUNA, Defendant. No. 75-74-Cr-CA. United States District Court, S. D. Florida. May 9, 1975. *353 Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty. and Samuel A. Alter, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for the government. James G. Roth, of Pollack, Tunkey, Robbins, Roth & Weiner, Miami, Fla., for defendant. ORDER DENYING POST TRIAL MOTIONS ATKINS, District Judge. This cause has come before the Court upon motions of the defendant, Lazaro Visuna, for..
15-001566BID  BSN SPORTS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY vs SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2015
Whether, when making a recommendation to award ITB No. 15C-26K (Term Contract for the Purchase of Physical Education/Athletic Supplies, Equipment, and Uniforms) to (1) Matty's Sports (Matty's), (2) Simmons Team Sports (Simmons), (3) D&J Commerce Solutions, Inc., d/b/a OLC Team Solutions (D&J), and (4) Palm Beach Sports (PB Sports), Respondent, School Board of Palm Beach County (School Board), acted contrary to one or more governing statutes, rules, policies, or procurement specifications, or any combination thereof; and if so, for each such instance, whether the misstep was clearly erroneous, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to competition.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the intended awardees, who had identical bids for a percentage discount on athletic merchandise, engaged in collusion. Recommend award of contracts as previously recommended by the School Board.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer