Hillsborough FL and Environmental Law Lawyers | Harry Vance -- eLawyers

Harry Vance Smith

Visitors: 31

Bar #109226(FL) License for 57 years

Tampa FL

Are you Harry Vance Smith? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

SC05-936 Miller v. Scottsdale Ins. Co. (2006)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: May 18, 2006 Citations: 932 So. 2d 1028

932 So. 2d 1028 (2006) Kathleen MILLER, et vir., Appellants, v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. SC05-936. Supreme Court of Florida. May 18, 2006. Charles P. Schropp and Amy S. Farrior of Schropp, Buell and Elligett, P.A., Harry Vance Smith of Smith, Clark, Delesie, Bierly, *1029 Mueller and Kadyk, Tampa, FL, for Appellant. Anthony J. Russo of Butler, Pappas, Weihmuller, Katz, and Craig, LLP, Tampa, FL, for Appellee. ANSTEAD, J. We have for review a question of Florida law certified by..

02-001116 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT vs BALM ASSOCIATES, INC. (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2002

The issue is whether Respondents should be subject to civil penalties and required to submit a Compliance Plan for the reasons stated in the Administrative Complaint and Order filed on January 8, 2002.Water use permittee responsible for over-pumpage of water by leasee using its property.

02-001117 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT vs GOODSON FARMS, INC. (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2002

The issue is whether Respondents should be subject to civil penalties and required to submit a Compliance Plan for the reasons stated in the Administrative Complaint and Order filed on January 8, 2002.Holder of water use permit responsible for over-pumpage of water by leasee using its property.

94-005656 LYKES PASCO, INC. vs L AND M FRUIT COMPANY, INC., AND AMERICAN SURETY AND CASUALTY COMPANY (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 11, 1994

The issues for determination in this case are whether Respondent as a licensed citrus fruit dealer breached an agreement with Petitioner relating to the purchase of citrus fruit during the 1991-1992 shipping season and further whether the breach of such agreement constitutes a violation of the Florida Citrus Code for which the proceeds of the citrus fruit dealer's bond should be paid to Petitioner pursuant to section 601.66, Florida Statutes.Breach of citrus fruit contract subjects dealers bond to payment of indebtedness.

Harry Vance Smith

SC05-936 Miller v. Scottsdale Ins. Co. (2006)

02-001116 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT vs BALM ASSOCIATES, INC. (2002)

02-001117 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT vs GOODSON FARMS, INC. (2002)

94-005656 LYKES PASCO, INC. vs L AND M FRUIT COMPANY, INC., AND AMERICAN SURETY AND CASUALTY COMPANY (1994)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.