Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Hillary Copeland Powell
Hillary Copeland Powell
Visitors: 41
0
Bar #85205(FL)     License for 14 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Hillary Copeland Powell? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.52120.569120.57120.595120.68253.77267.061373.414403.061403.813

Florida Administrative Code: 18-21.00418-21.005140E-4.051

12-003291  ELIZABETH PADRON vs CARL J. EKBLOM AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 2012
The issue is whether Carl J. Ekblom's (Ekblom's) application to install a boatlift at an existing dock in a man- made body of water in Islamorada is exempt from the need for an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP).Ekblom's application to install a boat lift on an existing dock was exempt from DEP permitting requirements, and did not create a navigational hazard; a cradle lift need not be physically attached to the dock.
12-002574  LAST STAND, INC., AND GEORGE HALLORAN vs FURY MANAGEMENT, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 31, 2012
The issues to be determined in this proceeding are whether Fury Management, Inc., is entitled to an environmental resource permit under chapter 373, Florida Statutes (2012),1/ and a sovereignty submerged land lease under chapter 253, Florida Statutes, for a proposed project in the waters off the coast of Key West, Florida.Petitioners failed to prove that the applicant is not entitled to the consolidated environmental resource permit and sovereignty submerged land lease.
09-001725  GOOSE BAYOU HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 01, 2009
The issue in this case is whether the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP or Department) should exempt Petitioner's alleged maintenance-dredging from wetland resource permitting under Florida Administrative Code Rule 62- 312.050(1)(e).1Petitioner did not prove entitlement to a maintenance-dredging exemption.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer