Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
James Hardin Peterson
James Hardin Peterson
Visitors: 140
0
Bar #473057(FL)    
Tallahassee FL

Are you James Hardin Peterson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

04-000701EC  IN RE: IRVING ELLSWORTH vs *  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 2004
Whether Respondent violated Subsection 112.3143(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2002),1 and, if so, what penalty should be recommended.City Commissioner voted on matters which inured to a special private gain to his employers.
05-001607EC  IN RE: LISA MARIE PHILLIPS vs *  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 04, 2005
The issues for determination are whether Respondent, as a member of the Bradenton Beach City Commission, violated Subsection 112.313(6), Florida Statutes (2004), by using her position to threaten and/or intimidate the Complainant, and, if so, what penalty should be recommended.Respondent misused her position as a member of the Bradenton Beach City Commission to threaten and/or intimidate Complainant during a verbal altercation arising out of a traffice incident in violation of Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes.
04-003831EC  IN RE: AL PARUAS vs *  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 2004
Whether the Respondent, Al Paruas (Respondent), as a member of the town council for the Town of Golden Beach, Florida, improperly used his influence, as a public officer, to have his wife’s parking ticket voided in violation of Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes (2002).Respondent`s use of his position as a town councilman, to have his wife`s parking ticket voided, constitutes a violations of the law of ethics.
04-002064EC  IN RE: BERND SCHULTE vs *  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 2004
Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes, "by having a contractual relationship with an individual engaged in a lawsuit involving the Town" and, if so, what is the appropriate penalty.The evidence was insufficient to establish that Respondent violated Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes, by entering into an agreement with an individual involved in a lawsuit with the Town.
99-002411EC  IN RE: CAROLYN FORD vs *  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 27, 1999
The issues for determination are: (1) whether Respondent, Carolyn Ford, as a member of the Quincy City Commission, violated Section 112.3135(2)(a), Florida Statutes, by advocating the appointment of her son for a position with the Quincy Police Department; (2) whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by using her official position as a member of the Quincy City Commission to attempt to obtain a job for her son with the Quincy Police Department; and (3) if so, what penalty is appropriate.Evidence failed to establish that Respondent, a Quincy City Commissioner, advocated the appointment of her son for a position with the police department.
02-002924EC  IN RE: SAMUEL G. S. BENNETT vs *  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 2002
The issue is whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by misusing his position as Chairman of the Town Council to obtain a personal benefit by attempting to change zoning classifications.Town Council chairman made a suggestion for rezoning his property through a method which was unavailable to other citizens.
03-002963EC  IN RE: JOHN L. CARTER vs *  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2003
The issues for determination are: Whether Respondent, John L. Carter, violated Section 112.3145, Florida Statutes (1995), by failing to file a CE Form 1, Statement of Financial Interests, for calendar year 1996. Whether Respondent violated Section 112.3145, Florida Statutes (1995), by failing to file a CE Form 1, Statement of Financial Interests, for calendar year 1997. Whether Respondent violated Section 112.3145, Florida Statutes (1995), by failing to file a CE Form 1, Statement of Financial Interests, for calendar year 1998.Respondent was a "local official"/"puchasing agent" as defined by statute. Respondent failed to file financial disclosure form CE 1 for 1996, 1997, and 1998. Recommend fine.
03-000122EC  IN RE: JULIANNE HOLT vs *  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 13, 2003
The issues for determination are: Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing Public Defender's Office employees to work on Respondent's re-election campaign during their public working hours; Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing Public Defender's Office employees, during public working hours and using public resources, to prepare and deliver materials for courses that Respondent was teaching; Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing a Public Defender's Office employee to take Respondent's personal automobile in for repairs during public work hours; Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing a Public Defender's Office employee to make personal bank deposits for Respondent and her mother during public work hours; and Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing Public Defender Office employees to type personal letters for Respondent during public work hours.The Advocate proved two of the alleged violations (using public resources to type private letters and prepare teaching materials). The RO discusses appropriate "non-business" letters and activities, and the allegations of misuse of public resources.
03-000199EC  IN RE: JULIANNE HOLT vs *  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 13, 2003
The issues for determination are: Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing Public Defender's Office employees to work on Respondent's re-election campaign during their public working hours; Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing Public Defender's Office employees, during public working hours and using public resources, to prepare and deliver materials for courses that Respondent was teaching; Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing a Public Defender's Office employee to take Respondent's personal automobile in for repairs during public work hours; Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing a Public Defender's Office employee to make personal bank deposits for Respondent and her mother during public work hours; and Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing Public Defender Office employees to type personal letters for Respondent during public work hours.The Advocate proved two of the alleged violations (using public resources to type private letters and prepare teaching materials). The RO discusses appropriate "non-business" letters and activities, and the allegations of misuse of public resources.
03-000200EC  IN RE: JULIANNE HOLT vs *  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 13, 2003
The issues for determination are: Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing Public Defender's Office employees to work on Respondent's re-election campaign during their public working hours; Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing Public Defender's Office employees, during public working hours and using public resources, to prepare and deliver materials for courses that Respondent was teaching; Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing a Public Defender's Office employee to take Respondent's personal automobile in for repairs during public work hours; Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing a Public Defender's Office employee to make personal bank deposits for Respondent and her mother during public work hours; and Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by directing Public Defender Office employees to type personal letters for Respondent during public work hours.The Advocate proved two of the alleged violations (using public resources to type private letters and prepare teaching materials). The RO discusses appropriate "non-business" letters and activities, and the allegations of misuse of public resources.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer