1. Whether Respondent violated Florida Statutes Section 489.129(1)(d), by willfully or deliberately disregarding and violating the applicable building codes or laws of the state or of any municipalities or counties thereof. 2. Whether Respondent violated Florida Statutes Section 489.129(1)(m), by being guilty of fraud or deceit or of gross negligence, incompetency, or misconduct in the practice of contracting. B. DOAH Case No. 90-1900, the Grantz, Victor, Beckett, Maffetonne, and Wolfe Complaints 3. Whether Respondent violated Sections 489.129(1)(m), (j), and 489.105(4), and 489.119, Florida Statutes, by being guilty of gross negligence, incompetence, and/or misconduct. 4. Whether Respondent violated Sections 489.129(1)(h), (m), (j), and 489.119, and 489.105(4), Florida Statutes, by being guilty of financial mismanagement or misconduct. 5. Whether Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(d), Florida Statutes, by wilful or deliberate violation or disregard of applicable local building codes and laws. 6. Whether Respondent violated Sections 489.129(1)(m), (j), 489.119, and 489.105(4), Florida Statutes, by failing to properly supervise contracting activities he was responsible for as qualifying agent, which supervisory deficiency also reflected gross negligence, incompetence, or misconduct 7. Whether Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(k), Florida Statutes, by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under contract as a contractor. 8. Whether Respondent violated Sections 489.129(1)(m), and (j), Florida Statutes, by giving a guarantee on a job to a consumer and thereafter failing to reasonably honor said guarantee in violation of Florida Statutes. C. DOAH Case No. 90-1901, the Klokow Complaint 9. Whether Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(d), Florida Statutes, by wilfully or deliberately disregarding and violating the applicable building codes or laws of the state or any municipalities or counties thereof. 10. Whether Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(k), Florida Statutes, by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under contract as a contractor. 11. Whether Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(m), Florida Statutes, by being guilty of fraud or of gross negligence, incompetency, or misconduct in the practice of contracting.Evidence establishes contractor is guilty of 29 violations and should have license revoked and be assessed maximum fines.

The issue in this case is whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license to practice dentistry based upon the alleged violation of Section 466.028(1)(y), Florida Statutes set forth in the Administrative Complaint.Respondent not guilty of charge of failing to meet minimum standards; x-rays should be taken before extracting teeth, but not required. Patient refused xrays

The issue in this case is whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license to practice dentistry based upon the alleged violations of Section 466.028(1)(i), Florida Statutes set forth in the Administrative Complaint.Respondent failed to maintain valid federal controlled substance registration; no deliberate attempt to circumvent the law was shown.