Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Jun. 16, 1995
The issues for determination are whether it was an arbitrary, fraudulent, dishonest or illegal exercise of agency discretion for Respondent to either: reject the proposal submitted by Petitioner, Morall & Carey ("Morall"), as unresponsive to the Solicitation for Proposals ("SFP"); or award the contracts for legal services for child support enforcement in Osceola and Seminole counties to Intervenor, rather than Petitioner, Sweeting & Halbert, P.A. ("Sweeting").Contract award was not arbitrary even though evaluation of proposals applied criteria not prescribed in Solicitation for Proposals and made mistakes in scoring.
