Leon FL Lawyers | Jane Mostoller -- eLawyers

63915 Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue (1984)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 14, 1984 Citations: 455 So. 2d 317

455 So. 2d 317 (1984) DELTA AIR LINES, INC., et al., Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee. No. 63915. Supreme Court of Florida. June 14, 1984. Rehearing Denied September 12, 1984. *318 J. Michael Huey and Stephen A. Ecenia of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, Tallahassee, for appellant Delta Air Lines, Inc. Darrey A. Davis and Juan T. O'Naghten of Steel, Hector & Davis, Miami, for appellant Pan American World Airways, Inc. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Joseph C. Mellichamp, III, Asst. Atty. Gen..

63949 Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue (1984)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 14, 1984 Citations: 455 So. 2d 311

455 So. 2d 311 (1984) EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee. No. 63949. Supreme Court of Florida. June 14, 1984. Rehearing Denied September 12, 1984. *313 Joseph F. Jennings of Kimbrell, Hamann, Jennings, Womack, Carlson & Kniskern, Miami, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Joseph C. Mellichamp, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Larry Levy, General Counsel and Jane Mostoller, Asst. General Counsel, Dept. of Revenue, Tallahassee, for appellee. ADKINS, Justice. The ..

95-000904BID HUBBARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY vs BOARD OF REGENTS (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 28, 1995

The issue for consideration in this case is whether the Respondent, Florida Board of Regents, acted fraudulently, arbitrarily, illegally or dishonestly in its award of Board Project Number BR-403, for the extension of Gemini Boulevard on the campus of the University of Central Florida, (UCF), to Amick Construction, Ltd., the second lowest bidder, instead of to Petitioner, Hubbard Construction Company, the lowest bidder.Low bidder on construction contract failed to show that agency action rejecting its bid was arbitrary, capricious, illegal, or irresponsible.

93-002740BID OPUS SOUTH CORPORATION vs BOARD OF REGENTS (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 1993

The issue presented is whether Petitioner is the lowest, responsive bidder on Board of Regents' Project BR-787.Good faith effort criterion made nonmaterial where list of minority organiza tions given to only some bidders and where compliance a meaningless act.

93-000562BID SOVRAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. vs BOARD OF REGENTS (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 04, 1993

The issue in this proceeding is a formal protest by Sovran Construction Company, Inc. regarding the Florida Board of Regents' intent to award to Indus Construction Company a contract for construction of the student union building at the University of Central Florida. The protest is based on Petitioner's allegation that Indus Construction Company's bid should be rejected as non-responsive for failure to meet minority business enterprise (MBE) participation or good faith effort requirements.Contractor not required to negotiate prices with Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) sub-contractot to meet good faith efforts requires- low bidder met good faith effort with zero MBE-no error.

92-002272BID CENTEX-ROONEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC. vs BOARD OF REGENTS (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 1992

Whether the Respondent properly rejected the Petitioner's bid for Board of Regents (BOR) project 658 because it did not comply with the good faith effort requirements of the General and Special Conditions of the project's specifications?Low bidder failed to prove good faith effort when it did the required things in the wrong order.

91-002703BID DOOLEY AND MACK CONSTRUCTORS, INC. vs BOARD OF REGENTS (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 03, 1991

The primary issue for determination is whether Petitioner's bid, in response to Respondent's invitation to bid, is responsive; and, if so, whether Petitioner should be awarded the bid. Determination of this issue requires resolution of other issues; whether Petitioner complied with "good faith requirements" related to advertising for minority business enterprise (MBE) participation, or whether failure to comply with those requirements constitutes a material defect in Petitioner's bid response.Failure to comply with Minority Business Enterprise participation requirements was a material defect in bid response.

90-002652BID ANGLIN CONSTRUCTION CO. vs BOARD OF REGENTS (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 1990

The issues for determination in this proceeding are: (1) whether the Respondent properly rejected the lowest bid because the bid did not comply with the requirements set forth in the Project Manual, and (2) whether the Respondent properly awarded the bid to the second lowest bidder.Minority business enterprise; good faith efforts; advertising jobs; contractor's disqualification reversed on showing 15 percent plus participation by Minority Business Enterprise's.

89-006844BID D. E. WALLACE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION vs BOARD OF REGENTS (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 13, 1989

The issues are whether the Petitioner, D.E. Wallace Construction Corp., is the lowest responsive bidder on project BR-116; whether the Respondent, the Florida Board of Regents, correctly rejected the bid submitted by the Petitioner; and whether the bid on BR-116 should be awarded to the Intervenor, Anglin Construction Company.Failure to identify Minority Business Enterprise participation in bid documents is a material defect and cannot be waived.

Jane Mostoller