Whether Respondent, Nicholas Anthony Musashe (Respondent Musashe), is guilty of failure to account or deliver funds and failure to follow procedures as required by Subsection 475.25(1)(d)1., Florida Statutes (2003). Whether Respondent Musashe is guilty of failure to provide written notification to the Florida Real Estate Commission (FREC) within 15 days of the last party's demand as required by Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J2-10.032(1)(a). Whether Respondent Musashe is guilty of culpable negligence or breach of trust in any business transaction in violation of Subsection 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2003). Whether Respondent, The Jander Group, Inc. (Jander Group), is guilty of failure to account or deliver funds and failure to follow procedures, as required by Subsection 475.25(1)(d)1., Florida Statutes (2003). Whether the Jander Group is guilty of failure to provide written notification to the FREC within 15 days of the last party's demand as required by Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J2-10.032(1)(a). Whether the Jander Group is guilty of culpable negligence or breach of trust in any business transaction in violation of Subsection 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2003).The Florida Real Estate Commission changed its interpretation of the statute which effects the Landlord/Tenant Act and Section 475.25(1) without notice to the brokers creating an estoppel. Respondents broker and corporation are not guilty of the charges.

The issue is whether Petitioner's application for licensure as a real estate instructor should be approved.Petitioner demonstrated that he was rehabilitated and had good character since his disqualifying offense in 1997. Recommend that Petitioner`s application for a real estate instructor license be approved.

The issues in the case are whether the allegations set forth in the Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent assisted in payment of compensation to an unlicensed person involved in negotiations for a real estate transaction.

The issue in this case is whether Respondent is guilty of dishonest dealing by trick, scheme or device in any business transaction in violation of Subsection 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008),1 and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved only minor violation by Respondent. A fine of $1,000 is warranted.

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent failed to report a criminal conviction on real estate associates license application. Recommend that Respondent`s license be revoked.

Whether Petitioner is qualified to take the examination for licensure as a registered assistant rental estate appraiser.The Petitioner, who had six felony convictions, showed good behavior and work for five years. The issue is one of Agency discretion. Recommend: permit the Petitioner to sit for exam and, if he passes, license him with significant restrictions.