Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Jeff Goodman
Jeff Goodman
Visitors: 223
1
Chipley FL

Are you Jeff Goodman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

20-000140BID  BERKELEY LANDING, LTD., AND BERKELEY LANDING DEVELOPER, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000141BID  BRISAS DEL ESTE APARTMENTS, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000142BID  NORTHSIDE PROPERTY III, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000143BID  HOMESTEAD 26115, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000145BID  HTG BELLA VISTA, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000030  EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY vs JAMES V. SMITH, SR.  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 03, 2020
Whether Petitioner must be discharged from his position as a sanitation equipment operator II because he can no longer perform the essential functions of that job, with or without a reasonable accommodation.The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that Mr. Smith cannot tolerate the physical demands associated with his former postition as a sanitation equipment operator II.
19-006169PL  RICHARD CORCORAN, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs CAMARA BAIYINA NJERI TUNSILL  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 20, 2019
The issues are whether Respondent, Camara Baiyna Njeri Tunsill, violated section 1012.795(1)(j), Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rule 6A-10.081(2)(a)1., as alleged in the August 14, 2019, Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what disciplinary penalty should be imposed.Petitioner established, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent violated § 1012.795(1)(J), Fla. Stat., & Fla. Admin. Code R. 6A-10.081(2)(a)1., and a 1-yr suspension, nunc pro tunc, from May 31, 2019, and 12 months of probation, is recommended.
19-006331PL  FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION vs KURN TSUK HO LAM  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 26, 2019
Whether Respondent, Kurn Tsuk Ho Lam (Respondent), failed to maintain good moral character required of law enforcement officers because he knowingly and willfully1 failed to report suspected child abuse and, if so, what is the appropriate penalty. 1 Pre-hearing stipulation, ¶1.Petitioner did not prove that Respondent failed to maintain good moral character required of a law enforcement officer by knowingly and willfully failing to report suspected child abuse. The Administrative Complaint should be dismissed.
19-003672  SALANA TYSON vs ALACHUA COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 11, 2019
The issues are whether Respondent, Alachua County Tax Collector, discriminated against Petitioner based upon her race, in violation of section , Florida Statutes,1 and/or whether Respondent retaliated against Petitioner for the exercise of protected rights under section 760.10.Petitioner failed to prove that her dismissal was due to anything other than her own gross insubordination.
19-005536  SELWYN TITUS vs MIAMI DADE COUNTY  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 16, 2019
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Miami-Dade County ("MDC" or the "County"), discriminated against Petitioner ("Petitioner" or "Titus") on the basis of his race, age, national origin, disability, or retaliation in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act ("FCRA"), when it did not hire or promote him to the Technical Equipment Instructor ("TEI") vacancy.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent discriminated against him when it failed to promote him. Concern regarding the Petitioner's disciplinary record made him dissimilar from winner and was a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason not to promote him.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer