Leon FL Administrative law and Health care Lawyers | Jeffrey -- eLawyers

05-003144BID UNISYS CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 30, 2005

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the intent to award a contract by the Department of Children and Family Services (DCF) or (Department) for programming and programming analysis support services for the Florida Online Recipient Integrated Data Access System (the Florida System) to Intervenor, Deloitte Consulting LLP (Deloitte), is in accordance with the governing statutes, rules, and policies applicable to the Department's procurement, and to the specifications in the Request for Proposals (RFP). It must also be determined whether the decision by DCF to disqualify the Petitioner, Unisys Corporation (Unisys), for allegedly being unresponsive to the specifications and terms of the RFP in a material way, is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner failed to show a proposal sufficiently responsive to the Request for Proposal specs to be deemed responsive. Therefore, Petitioner could not have standing to attack the responsiveness of the other two vendors whom Respondent found responsive.

04-003976BID NCS PEARSON, INC., D/B/A PEARSON EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT vs DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 02, 2004

Whether Respondent, Department of Education's ("Respondent"), Notice of Intent to Award the contract for Request for Proposal No. 2005-01 ("RFP"), for Administration of the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test ("FCAT"), is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, rules or policies, or the bid or proposal specifications. Whether Respondent's proposed action was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.After receiving 3 bids to administer the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test, Respondent`s evaluation committee sought additional information from bidders, but did not violate basic requirements of statutes or the Request for Proposal. Notice upheld.

02-003749BID GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 24, 2002

02-004159BID GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 24, 2002

02-002224 NEUMA, INC., D/B/A NEUMA, INC. OF ILLINOIS vs DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2002

Whether Neuma, Inc. (Petitioner), should be granted licensure as a "viatical settlement provider" as defined by Section 626.9911(6), Florida Statutes.Lack of trustworthiness, as evidenced by material misrepresentations in the initial application, is sufficient to deny application for license as a viatical settlement provider.

96-004856BID STATE CONTRACTING AND ENGINEERING CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 1996

The issues in this proceeding are whether Gilbert’s bid proposal was responsive to the Department of Transportation’s bid proposal, and whether the Department of Transportation (Department) erred in accepting the bid of Gilbert. State alleged that Gilbert failed to comply with the DBE bid information submittal requirements of Rule 14-78.003(2)(b)3.a., Florida Administrative Code, in filing the DBE forms for the project.Held that Department of Transportation (DOT) erred in accepting BID of bidder who claimed 100% credit for Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation for work which the rules would only permit partial credit.

95-004171CON FORT WALTON BEACH MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A FORT WALTON BEACH MEDICAL CENTER vs BAPTIST HOSPITAL, INC., AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 1995

Whether the application of Fort Walton Beach Medical Center or that of Baptist Hospital should be approved to satisfy the need for one additional adult open heart surgery program in Agency For Health Care Administration District 1.Certificate of Need approved for open heart surgery application on condition that volumes maintained at exiting provider, with numeric need and need stipulated by the parties.

93-006207RU SACRED HEART HOSPITAL OF PENSACOLA vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 29, 1993

The issue for determination is whether an agency statement, and criteria used in support of the statement, constitute a rule under Subsection 120.52(16), Florida Statutes (1993), whether the statement and criteria have been adopted as a rule pursuant to Section 120.54, Florida Statutes (1993), and whether the statement and criteria violate Subsection 120.535(1), Florida Statutes (1993).Error in adjudication of a Certificate of need case not non-rule statement of general applicability; 120.535 petition dismissed.

93-004886CON WEST FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A WEST FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER vs BAPTIST HOSPITAL, INC., AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 25, 1993

Whether certificate of need application number 7184 for the establishment of adult open heart surgery services at Baptist Hospital, Pensacola, Florida, filed in March 1993, meets statutory and rule criteria for approval.Size of hospital, its cardiology department, cardiologists and patient preferences are institution-specific concerns not normal bases for open heart certificate of need.

93-004908CON LAWNWOOD MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A LAWNWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER vs MARTIN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 25, 1993

Which, if any, of the applications meet the statutory and rule criteria for the issuance of a certificate of need to operate an adult open heart surgery program in AHCA District 9.Geographic access immproved with open heart surgery con for more centrally located hospital; further from and with less impact on existing distric providers

Jeffrey Lee Frehn