Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Jeremy J. Ches
Jeremy J. Ches
Visitors: 22
0
Bar #649570(FL)     License for 21 years
Oviedo FL

Are you Jeremy J. Ches? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

2D14-3450  Bartow HMA, LLC v. Edwards  (2015)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 10, 2015
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BARTOW HMA, LLC d/b/a BARTOW ) REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-3450 ) AMBER EDWARDS and LARRY ) THOMAS, M.D., ) ) Respondents. ) _ ) Opinion filed July 10, 2015. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Polk County; Ellen S. Masters, Judge. Michael A. Petruccelli and Paul C. Buckley of Fann & Petruccelli, P.A., F..
1D10-4962  Stevens v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 08, 2010 Citations: 48 So. 3d 842
48 So. 3d 842 (2010) STEVENS v. STATE. No. 1D10-4962. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. November 8, 2010. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.
07-003163  6 TO 12 STORE 2, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 2007
The issue is whether a proposed sales tax assessment should become final agency action.Petitioner had adequate records for audit without sampling; sampling based on a field visit is not authorized by statute. The proposed sales tax assessment is incorrect.
93-002640  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JERRY J. NEMECEK  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 1993
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints? If so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him?Doctor guilty of substandard care and treatment of 2 patients and of pleading no contest to crime directly related to practice of medicine.
91-002712  GERALD J. VANACKER vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 02, 1991
At issue in this proceeding is whether petitioner owes respondent a tax and surcharge, together with interest, on account of an unlawful sale, use, consumption, distribution, manufacture, derivation, production, transportation or storage of cannabis.Petitioner's conspiracy with another to purchase and sell marijuana rendered him liable for taxes and penalties incident to such transaction.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer