welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Joanna Daniels
Joanna Daniels
Joanna Daniels
Visitors: 95
0
Bar #118321(FL)     License for 28 years; Member in Good Standing
Lealman FL

Are you Joanna Daniels? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 42 CFR 481.13, 42 CFR 481.13, 42 CFR 481.13, 42 CFR 483, 42 CFR 483 .25, 42 CFR 483.25, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75

Florida Laws: 11.242, 11.2421, 11.2422, 11.2423, 11.2424, 120.52, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 194.171, 20.04, 20.05, 20.42, 39.001, 395.4001, 400.021, 400.022, 400.102, 400.121, 400.19, 400.23, 400.235, 408.035, 415.102, 415.103, 415.1034, 415.111, 415.1111, 440.015, 440.02, 440.125, 440.13, 440.192, 440.20, 440.44, 518.01, 57.105, 574.08, 689.25, 75.01, 90.801, 90.956

11-001271PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY vs MARLY DELIS CUETO, P.T.  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 2011
The issues in this case are whether Respondent: (a) was convicted of a crime which directly relates to the practice of physical therapy; (b) failed to timely report a criminal conviction to the Board of Physical Therapy Practice; and (c) was terminated from the Medicaid program, as Petitioner has alleged; and, if one or more of these allegations are established, whether the Board should impose discipline on Respondent's physical therapy license within the applicable penalty guidelines or take some other action.Respondent was convicted of a crime which directly relates to the practice of physical therapy and failed to timely report the conviction. She was also terminated from the Medicaid program. For these offenses, discipline is recommended.
11-000716PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE vs DOUGLAS P. DVORAK, D.C.  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 10, 2011
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent violated sections 456.072(1)(w) and (x), Florida Statutes (2008), or 460.413(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2007), as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent was convicted of a crime related to his practice, and failed to notify the Board of his conviction. Recommend revocation.
04-002978  MEDNET CONNECT, INC.; ASPEN ADMINISTRATORS; AND FLORIDA GOLD CITRUS, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 20, 2004
The issues in this case are: (1) whether the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) properly determined that Petitioners should reimburse South Bay Hospital 60 percent of the amount charged for the outpatient surgery performed on a workers' compensation claimant; (2) whether the charges were undocumented, excessive, erroneous, incorrect, and/or duplicative; (3) whether the Agency complied with applicable rules in making its decision; (4) whether the employee who made the determination for the Agency had been delegated the authority to do so; and (5) whether the Agency has adopted guidelines and procedures for its employees to follow in making decisions in reimbursement disputes decided under Section 440.13, Florida Statutes (2003).1Respondent failed to establish any objective basis for its determination that the charges billed by the hospital accurately reflected the cost of the services by the health care provider. The amount due by the carrier cannot be based on that amount.
05-002018  FCCI INSURANCE GROUP vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 2005
The issue for determination is whether Intervenors are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2003).1Petitioner did not participate for an improper purpose by reducing the amount of hospital reimbursement, requesting a hearing, or challenging Respondent`s interpretation and enforcement of a rule promulagated by the Department of Financial Services.
05-002161  FCCI INSURANCE GROUP vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 14, 2005
The issue for determination is whether Intervenors are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2003).1Petitioner did not participate for an improper purpose by reducing the amount of hospital reimbursement, requesting a hearing, or challenging Respondent`s interpretation and enforcement of a rule promulagated by the Department of Financial Services.
05-002204  FCCI INSURANCE GROUP vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 2005
The issue for determination is whether Intervenors are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2003).1Petitioner did not participate for an improper purpose by reducing the amount of hospital reimbursement, requesting a hearing, or challenging Respondent`s interpretation and enforcement of a rule promulagated by the Department of Financial Services.
05-002205  FCCI INSURANCE GROUP vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 2005
The issue for determination is whether Intervenors are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2003).1Petitioner did not participate for an improper purpose by reducing the amount of hospital reimbursement, requesting a hearing, or challenging Respondent`s interpretation and enforcement of a rule promulagated by the Department of Financial Services.
05-002206  FCCI INSURANCE GROUP vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 2005
The issue for determination is whether Intervenors are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2003).1Petitioner did not participate for an improper purpose by reducing the amount of hospital reimbursement, requesting a hearing, or challenging Respondent`s interpretation and enforcement of a rule promulagated by the Department of Financial Services.
05-002207  FCCI INSURANCE GROUP vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 2005
The issue for determination is whether Intervenors are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2003).1Petitioner did not participate for an improper purpose by reducing the amount of hospital reimbursement, requesting a hearing, or challenging Respondent`s interpretation and enforcement of a rule promulagated by the Department of Financial Services.
05-002256  FCCI INSURANCE GROUP vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 21, 2005
The issue for determination is whether Intervenors are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2003).1Petitioner did not participate for an improper purpose by reducing the amount of hospital reimbursement, requesting a hearing, or challenging Respondent`s interpretation and enforcement of a rule promulagated by the Department of Financial Services.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer