Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Joe Belitzky
Joe Belitzky
Visitors: 81
0
Bar #217301(FL)     License for 48 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Joe Belitzky? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

4D05-3831  Castagna v. Lindsey  (2006)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2006 Citations: 933 So. 2d 535
933 So. 2d 535 (2006) CASTAGNA v. LINDSEY. No. 4D05-3831. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 5, 2006. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
81-1173  ROMAR INTERN., INC. v. Jim Rathman Chevrolet/Cadillac, Inc.  (1982)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 1982 Citations: 420 So. 2d 346
420 So. 2d 346 (1982) ROMAR INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. JIM RATHMAN CHEVROLET/CADILLAC, INC., a Florida Corporation and General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Appellees. No. 81-1173. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. October 6, 1982. *347 Richard A. Manzo of Manzo, Rogers & Wright, Titusville, for appellant. Lori J. Caldwell of Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell, & Cabaniss, P.A., Orlando, for appellees. FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge. Appellees..
88-2947, 88-3010  Brod v. Adler  (1990)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 16, 1990 Citations: 570 So. 2d 1312
570 So. 2d 1312 (1990) E. Dennis BROD and G.M. Brod & Co., Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellants, v. Ira L. ADLER, Appellee. Nos. 88-2947, 88-3010. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 20, 1990. On Motion for Rehearing, Clarification and Certification October 16, 1990. On Motion for Rehearing October 16, 1990. Hickey & Jones, and John H. Hickey, Miami, for appellants. Joe N. Unger, Miami, and Ullman & Ullman, and Michael W. Ullman, North Miami Beach, for appellee. Befor..
5D08-2775  Sadler v. State  (2009)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2009 Citations: 6 So. 3d 622
6 So. 3d 622 (2009) SADLER v. STATE. No. 5D08-2775. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. April 7, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
50301  State v. Rou  (1978)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 09, 1978 Citations: 366 So. 2d 385
366 So. 2d 385 (1978) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. George M. ROU, Jr., Appellee. No. 50301. Supreme Court of Florida. November 9, 1978. Rehearing Denied February 13, 1979. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Gary L. Conover and Joe Belitzky, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee and Stephen L. Boyles, State's Atty., Palatka, for appellant. Ben Daniel, Jr., Ocala, for appellee. BOYD, Justice. An information was filed in the County Court of Marion County charging Marion County Commissioner George M. Rou, Jr...
2D07-5490  McDougall v. Culver  (2009)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 2009 Citations: 3 So. 3d 391
3 So. 3d 391 (2009) John J. McDOUGALL, as Sheriff of Lee County, Florida, Appointing Authority of the Lee County Civil Service Board, and John J. McDougall, as Sheriff of Lee County, Florida, Appointing Authority of an unnamed ad hoc disciplinary committee of The Office of the Sheriff of Lee County, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Frances C. CULVER, Richard P. Snyder, Stephen A. Humfleet, Linda Kress, Matthew R. Leclair, Scott W. Massingill, Robert Wardrop, and All Others Similarly Situated, Appel..
94-1618  Johnson v. State  (1995)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 1995 Citations: 653 So. 2d 1074
653 So. 2d 1074 (1995) Edward Earl JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 94-1618. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. April 12, 1995. Rehearing Denied May 17, 1995. *1075 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Douglas J. Glaid, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GREEN, JJ. PER CURIAM. Edward Earl Johnson appeals from a judgment o..
3D06-241  Moreno v. Diaz  (2006)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 13, 2006 Citations: 943 So. 2d 1011
943 So. 2d 1011 (2006) Arnulfo MORENO and Yamileth Moreno, Appellants, v. Jose DIAZ and George Lopez, Appellees. No. 3D06-241. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. December 13, 2006. Beckham & Beckham and Robert Beckham, Miami, for appellants. Douberley & Cicero and William M. Douberley, Sunrise, for appellees. Before WELLS, CORTIÑAS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ. CORTIÑAS, Judge. The plaintiffs, Arnulfo Moreno and his wife Yamileth Moreno (collectively "the Morenos"), appeal an order grant..
79-1146  Julia McCain Lampkin-Asam v. The Supreme Court of Florida  (1979)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: Aug. 27, 1979 Citations: 601 F.2d 760
601 F.2d 760 Julia McCain LAMPKIN-ASAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 79-1146 Summary Calendar. * United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Aug. 27, 1979. Julia McCain Lampkin-Asam, pro se. Joe Belitzky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Before GOLDBERG, RONEY and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Naming "The Supreme Court of Flori..
82-002718  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs. KEY LARGO INVESTORS, INC.  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 08, 1983
The ultimate issues to be resolved in this proceeding are whether the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission should grant or deny permission to Key Large Investors, Inc., to develop and what, if any, conditions and restrictions should be attached to development approval or denial. The Department of Community Affairs contends that Monroe County improperly approved the preliminary development plan and final development plan because the plans did not comply with the requirements of local ordinances and rules of the Florida Administration Commission and that the development plans were inconsistent with the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan. Key Large Investors, Inc., contends that the appeal should be dismissed because it was not filed within the required time limits, that the Department of Community Affairs is estopped from maintaining the appeal, and that the development comports with local and state criteria. The Florida Audubon Society agrees with the contentions of the Department of Community Affairs, and Monroe County agrees with the contentions of Key Largo Investors, Inc.Department of Community Affairs (DCA) should not stop development's first phase as approved by county.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer