Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Joel Stephen Fass
Joel Stephen Fass
Visitors: 25
0
Bar #213233(FL)     License for 48 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Joel Stephen Fass? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Bankruptcy No. 88-5795-8B7, Adv. No. 89-485  Matter of Glickman  (1991)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 1991 Citations: 126 B.R. 124
126 B.R. 124 (1991) In the Matter of Lawrie B. GLICKMAN, DDS, Ruth L. Glickman d/b/a Dwight Dental Care, Debtors. MDFC EQUIPMENT LEASING CORP., Plaintiff, v. Lawrie B. GLICKMAN, Donald E. Lamar, D.D.S., P.A., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 88-5795-8B7, Adv. No. 89-485. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. April 9, 1991. *125 Daniel R. Matthews, for plaintiff. Charles Perry, for defendant. David J. Tong, for Donald L. Lamar. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CONTINUING POST-JUDGMENT WR..
08-002246  ALEX J. CAMPOS vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 09, 2008
Whether Campos' Petition for Termination of Restriction and Prohibition of the January 12, 1995, Final Order should be granted because Campos has demonstrated that he is rehabilitated, fit, and trustworthy to have those restrictions lifted.Petitioner failed to meet the burden to demonstrate that he is rehabilitated, fit and trustworthy to have the restrictions removed for Florida licensure and therefore, Petitioner's Petition to Terminate the Restriction and Prohibition is denied.
82-000869  BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS vs. ARNOLD OPER  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 29, 1990
Petitioner didn't prove Respondent acted without due care and in a manner to pose threat to practice of medicine. Recommend dismissal.
88-004581RX  HIALEAH, INC. vs. DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 28, 1989
Whether the Proposed Amendment of Rule 7E-6.007, Florida Administrative Code, is arbitrary and capricious and thus constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated authority?Proposed amendment to Rule 7E-6.007(3),FAC is within Resp's delegated legis- lative authority. Pet failed to establish invalidity of proposed amendment.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer