On August 6, 1993, the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA or Agency) published a Notice of Adult Open Heart Surgery Program Fixed Need Pool in the Florida Administrative Weekly, Vol. 19, No. 31. The Agency projected need for one additional adult open heart surgery (OHS) program in District X for the January 1996 planning horizon. District X consists entirely of Broward County, Florida. Five hospitals in Broward County, including Petitioner Columbia Hospital Corporation of South Broward d/b/a Westside Regional Medical Center (Westside), timely filed Letters of Intent and submitted Certificate of Need (CON) applications seeking to establish an adult OHS program at their respective facilities. The Agency assigned CON Action No. 7455 to Westside's CON application. On January 21, 1994, AHCA published in the Florida Administrative Weekly, Vol. 20, No. 3, notice of its intent to preliminarily deny all CON applications for an adult OHS program in District X. Four of the five applicants timely filed petitions to challenge AHCA's decision, including Cleveland Clinic Florida Hospital d/b/a Cleveland Clinic Hospital (Cleveland Clinic) (DOAH Case No. 94- 1019), Westside (DOAH Case No. 94-1020), North Broward Hospital District d/b/a North Broward Medical Center (NBMC) (DOAH Case No. 94-1022), and Plantation General Hospital, L.P. (DOAH Case No. 94-1023).Petitioner did not prove that there was a need for another open heart surgery program in District X. Petitioner's proposal did not meet statutory and rule criteria.

Whether the application of Delray Community Hospital for a certificate of need to add 24 acute care beds meets, on balance, the applicable criteria for approval.Over 75% medical/surgery and over 100% occupancy in some intensive care unit beds in trauma center with open heart surgery with above average elderly in area result in need for more acute beds.

Whether the certificate of need application filed by Orlando Regional Healthcare System, Inc. should be dismissed as incomplete because the capital costs were not included in the notice of the proposed project published in the newspaper.Certificate of Need application rejected for not including capital costs in newspaper notice of filing.

Which of two competing applications for nursing home beds better meets the statutory and rule criteria to satisfy the numeric need for 79 additional beds in Agency for Health Care Administration District 7, Subdistrict 1, Brevard County.AHCA interprets rule to require board resolution only with letter of intent; superior design to separate subacute and alzheimers' care favored over part Hospital-owned application.

Whether Rule 59C-1.038, the acute care bed need rule, is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Whether this rule challenge should be dismissed as an untimely attack on a published fixed need pool.Acute care bed need methodology rule invalid for yielding irrational gross overestimate of need for added beds with average 50% occupancy statewide.

Whether Respondent should be held responsible for the violations alleged in the amended Administrative Action? If so, what penalty should be imposed against it?Licensee liable for repeated & flagrant acts of indecency & obscenity eng- aged in by dancers working on licensed premises; 2nd offense: revocation rec

Whether Respondent, or his agent or employee, possessed, or permitted someone to possess, at or in the licensed premises, alcoholic beverages not authorized by law to be sold by Respondent. Whether Respondent, or his agent or employee, allowed patrons to gamble at card games, contrary to Section 849.01, Florida Statutes. Whether Respondent, his agent or employee allowed patrons to possess and consume marijuana and crack cocaine on the licensed premises.Respondent guilty of allowing unauthorized alcohol and gambling on premises; not guilty of permitting marijuna and cocaine; fine, suspension.

Which, if any, of the four certificate of need applications for short-term psychiatric beds in Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services District 9 should be approved.No need for additional short term psychiatric beds even though numeric need indicated; low occupancy in like and existing providers below rule levels.

The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent is guilty of the violations alleged in the administrative complaint dated October 8, 1991; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Teacher's effectiveness seriously reduced by informal actions with students no showing of immoral conduct.

At issue in this proceeding is whether respondent committed the offenses set forth in the administrative complaint and, if so, what disciplinary action should be imposed.Teacher who physically and verbally abused students guilty of gross immorality or act involving moral turpitude warranting revocation of certification.