7 So. 3d 1112 (2009) S.P. v. BERRY. No. 3D09-1222. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 6, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Hab.Corp.granted.
937 So. 2d 137 (2006) SILVERSTEIN v. STATE. No. 4D06-2394. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. August 16, 2006. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Respondents, Florida Department of Transportation (“FDOT”) and Palm Beach County (also referred to as “the Applicants”), are entitled to the issuance of an Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) to construct an extension of State Road 7 (“SR 7”) and its associated surface water management system in Palm Beach County.Petitioner failed to prove that the applicants were not entitled to the environmental resource permit to build the SR 7 extension and associated surface water management system.
The issues in this case are: 1) whether the Petitioner, Southport Ranch, LLC (Petitioner), is a substantially affected person with standing to challenge the Respondent, South Florida Water Management District’s (District) intent to issue Environmental Resource Permit (Mitigation Banking) Number 49-00007-M to the Respondents, D.R. Horton, Inc., and Osceola County (Applicants); and 2) the number of potential mitigation bank credits that the District should award to the Applicants.Petitioner did not carry its burden of proving that Respondents were not entitled to the proposed amount of mitigation credits. Respondents carried their burden of showing entitlement to the requested mitigation bank permit.
402 So. 2d 559 (1981) Billy Jerold MOSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. WW-34. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 21, 1981. Tyrie A. Boyer of Boyer, Tanzler, Blackburn & Boyer, Jacksonville, for appellant. Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee. THOMPSON, Judge. Mosley appeals his conviction for the sale or delivery of cannabis, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and attempted second degree murder. He contends in par..
895 So. 2d 1241 (2005) ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, INC., as assignee of Matthew Winik, Appellee. Nos. 4D03-4534, 4D03-4537. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 2, 2005. Jack R. Reiter of Adorno & Yoss, P.A., Miami, and Richard C. Godfrey, P.C., and Andrew A. Kassof of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for appellants Allstate Insurance Co. and Allstate Indemnity Co. Peter J. Valeta of McGuire Woods LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Amicus..
6 So. 3d 54 (2009) BOONE v. MID FLORIDA MEDICAL SERVICES. No. 1D08-5086. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 1, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
The issue to be determined is whether Application No. 090107-1 for Environmental Resource Permit No. 56-03461-P and the Sovereignty Submerged Lands Public Easement for the Crosstown Parkway Extension should be issued as proposed in the notice issued by the South Florida Water Management District.The City of Port St. Lucie was entitled to issuance of an Environmental Resource Permit and Sovereignty Lands Easement for the Crosstown Parkway Extension over the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Aquatic Preserve.
The issue to be determined is whether Petitioners, William Guererro and Christina Bang, a/k/a Christina Guerrero, are entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, from Respondents, Bernard Spinrad and Marien Spinrad, related to litigation between the parties in DOAH Case No. 13- 2254.Petitioners failed to demonstrate that they were entitled to an award of attorney's fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes.
The issue to be determined is whether the applicants, William Guererro and Christina Bang, a/k/a Christina Guerrero (Applicants), are entitled to issuance of a Consolidated Environmental Resource Permit and State Lands Approvals for various structures on the Applicants’ property at 58458 Overseas Highway, Marathon, Florida.The Applicants demonstrated that they were entitled to the exemptions and general permit for structures and activiites on their property, and to the soverign submerged lands authorizations related thereto.
