Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: May 15, 1992
The issue in this case is whether the County's comprehensive plan amendment 91B.9 is "in compliance" under the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. (It must be found to be "in compliance" if the County's determination that it is "in compliance" is at least "fairly debatable.")DCA intent: plan amendment in compliance. Petitioner didn't prove beyond fair debate, change from residential to mixed land use inconsistent with Future Land Use Map.
