Clay FL Construction and development, Land use and zoning an -- eLawyers

82-1900 Eh v. State, Dept. of H & R Services (1984)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 24, 1984 Citations: 443 So. 2d 1083

443 So. 2d 1083 (1984) In the Interest of E.H., a Minor, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee. No. 82-1900. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 24, 1984. Sullivan, Admire & Sullivan, Coral Gables, and John G. Admire, Miami, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Bruce Barkett, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before HENDRY and HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a final order adjudicating a ch..

26612 William J. Maxwell v. Southern Christian Leadership Conference (1969)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: Sep. 02, 1969 Citations: 414 F.2d 1065

414 F.2d 1065 William J. MAXWELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 26612. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. September 2, 1969. 1 Peter A. Hall, Birmingham, Ala., Charles Stephen Ralston, San Francisco, Cal., Norman C. Amaker, James M. Nabrit, III, Jack Greenberg, New York City, for defendants-appellants. 2 Jerry O. Lorant, John Kopelousos, Lorant, Bouloukos & Kopelousos, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee. 3 Befor..

3D05-877 Key v. State (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 20, 2008 Citations: 990 So. 2d 529

990 So. 2d 529 (2008) Chentee KEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D05-877. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 20, 2008. Rehearing Denied September 5, 2008. *530 Franz A. Parke, Miami, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Robin F. Hazel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE and LAGOA, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal of a judgment and sentence for three counts of sexual battery, one count o..

99-005365VR CHARLES J. HARRIS TRUST vs CLAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 23, 1999

Whether Petitioner, the Charles J. Harris Trust, has demonstrated, pursuant to the Vested Rights Review Process of Clay County, Florida, that a vested rights certificate to undertake development of certain real property located in Clay County should be issued by Clay County, notwithstanding the fact that part of such development will not be in accordance with the requirements of the Clay County 2001 Comprehensive Plan?Applicant failed to prove it was not subject to the Clay County Comprehensive Plan because of equitably vested rights.

99-003955VR K. S. RAVINES CORPORATION, vs CLAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 21, 1999

Whether Petitioner, K. S. Ravines Corporation, has demonstrated, pursuant to the Vested Rights Review Process of Clay County, Florida, that a vested rights certificate to undertake development of certain real property located in Clay County should be issued by Clay County, notwithstanding the fact that part of such development will not be in accordance with the requirements of the Clay County 2001 Comprehensive Plan?Petitioner proved Clay County is equitably estopped from forcing Petitioner to comply with the Comprehensive Plan.

94-004057 JULIE HELLMUTH vs FLORIDA SOLITE COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 19, 1994

Is Solite entitled to an air source permit for a stationary installation that would allow Solite to install a baghouse, a top load pulse-jet dust collector (or equivalent); a heat exchanger; to modify the duct systems for existing kilns Nos. 1, 1A, and 5, thus allowing any kiln to discharge through the proposed baghouse No. 1 or an existing baghouse No. 5; to connect kilns Nos. 1 and 1A to an existing pug mill filter receiver and clinker hopper filter receiver; to install a pneumatic system to connect proposed baghouse No. 1 to an existing lime and clay fines system and to install other associated equipment? This permit would also allow the temporary operation of baghouse No. 1.Applicant is entitled to an air source permit to install a baghouse.

92-006949VR R. L. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND DEVELOPERS THREE (RIVER BEND SUBDIVISION) vs CLAY COUNTY (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 23, 1992

Whether the Petitioners, R.L. Johnson Construction Co. and Developers Three, Inc., have demonstrated, pursuant to the Vested Rights Review Process of Clay County, Florida, that a vested right to undertake development of certain real property located in Clay County should be issued by Clay County notwithstanding the fact that part of such development will not be in accordance with the requirements of the Clay County 2001 Comprehensive Plan?Applicants proved they had equitable vested rights to continue development of property without complying with Clay County Comprehensive Plan.

92-006948VR RALPH R. COLEMAN AND SPECTRA BUILDERS (BEAR RUN SUBDIVISION) vs CLAY COUNTY (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 23, 1992

Whether the Petitioner, Bear Run Development, Inc., has demonstrated, pursuant to the Vested Rights Review Process of Clay County, Florida, that it has a vested right to undertake development of certain real property located in Clay County notwithstanding the fact that part of such development will not be in accordance with the requirements of the Clay County 2001 Comprehensive Plan?Applicant proved it had equitable vested right to develop property without complying with the Clay County comprehensive plan.

91-003087 THOMAS E. FORTSON; DON M. LOOP; SAMUEL D. ROWLEY, M.D.; RONALD L. RISH, M.D.; GERALD R. AGRESTI; DAVID B. LEE; SCOTT D. RITCHIE; NANCY K. LONGHARDT; DAMON C. LOOP; AND DALE B PURCELL vs KINGSLEY SERVICE COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 16, 1991

The issue is whether the Respondent, Kingsley Service Company, should be granted an operating permit to increase the capacity of its Fleming Oaks Waste Water Treatment Plant from .490 MGD to .720 MGD.Antidegradation rule doesn't apply to preexisting or approved facilities. Application showed discharge met requirements. Foes failed to show sludge buildup was from existing plant

John Kopelousos