welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. John Marston
John Marston
John Marston
Visitors: 61
0
Bar #36193(FL)     License for 17 years
Key West FL

Are you John Marston? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Nos. 4092-05, 4296-05, 4589-05, 4592-05, 5161-05, 5162-05, 5163-05  Clark v. Comm'r  (2008)
United States Tax Court Filed: Dec. 15, 2008
T.C. Memo. 2008-279 UNITED STATES TAX COURT DAVID C. AND WENDY CLARK, ET AL.,1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 4092-05, 4296-05, Filed December 15, 2008. 4589-05, 4592-05, 5161-05, 5162-05, 5163-05. Paul E. Kent, for petitioners. Catherine G. Chang and Jon D. Feldhammer, for respondent. 1 Cases of the following petitioners are consolidated herewith: American Synergy Asbestos Removal Services, Inc., a.k.a. Synergy Environmental, Inc., docket No. 4296-05; Cla..
No. 14147-04S  FLORES v. COMMISSIONER  (2005)
United States Tax Court Filed: May 10, 2005
T.C. Summary Opinion 2005-57 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ANTHONY M. FLORES AND SANDRA L. FLORES, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14147-04S. Filed May 10, 2005. Anthony M. Flores and Sandra L. Flores, pro sese. Alan J. Tomsic, for respondent. ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time that the petition was filed.1 The decision to 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all su..
14-3744  Deangelo Horn v. State of Florida  (2014)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2014
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DEANGELO HORN, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D14-3744 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _/ Opinion filed September 9, 2014. Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel - Original Jurisdiction. DeAngelo Horn, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition alleging ineffectiv..
18  Singer Mfg. Co. v. Cramer  (1904)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 01, 1904 Citations: 1904 U.S. LEXIS 994, 192 U.S. 265, 24 S. Ct. 291, 48 L. Ed. 437
192 U.S. 265 (1904) SINGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. CRAMER. No. 18. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 18, 19, 1903. Decided February 1, 1904. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *275 Mr. Charles C. Linthicum and Mr. Charles K. Offield for petitioner. Mr. John H. Miller for respondent. MR. JUSTICE WHITE, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. Sixty-eight exceptions were taken by the Singer Company during the trial of the a..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer