welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Jonathan Alan Beckerman
Jonathan Alan Beckerman
Jonathan Alan Beckerman
Visitors: 47
0
Bar #568252(FL)     License for 23 years
Miami FL

Are you Jonathan Alan Beckerman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

15-003942  MARY L. SMITH vs WAL-MART STORES, EAST, LP  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 15, 2015
Whether Respondent, Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP (Respondent or Wal-Mart), violated the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, sections 760.01–760.11 and 509.092, Florida Statutes,1/ by discriminating against Petitioner, Mary L. Smith (Petitioner), based upon Petitioner’s race, age, or in retaliation for her participation in protected activity.Petitioner failed to prove her claims of discrimination in employment based on race, age, and retaliation.
12-004015  DR. SHARON E. MCINTOSH vs WAL-MART STORES EAST  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 17, 2012
Whether Respondent violated the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as alleged in the Employment Charge of Discrimination filed by Petitioner on May 31, 2012.Petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving that Respondent discriminated against her in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992.
12-001119  TRACY LYNN WRIGHT vs WAL-MART  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 27, 2012
Whether Respondent, Walmart, discriminated against Petitioner, Tracy Lynn Wright, in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, sections 760.01–760.11 and 509.092, Florida Statutes, by harassing, failing to promote, demoting, and then discharging her in retaliation for her participation in a class- action discrimination lawsuit against Walmart.Petitioner failed to prove her claim of retaliation under section 760.10, Florida Statutes.
08-001755  JONNETTA BENEDICT vs WAL-MART STORES EAST  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 10, 2008
Whether Respondent committed the violation alleged in Petitioner’s Public Accommodations Complaint of Discrimination filed by Petitioner on September 6, 2007, and if so, what relief should be provided.Petitioner did not prove a prima facie case. Respondent`s actions were based on a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer