St. Johns FL Administrative law, General practice and Health -- eLawyers

BK-219 Village Park Mobile Home Ass'n Inc. v. State, Dept. of Business (1987)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 08, 1987 Citations: 506 So. 2d 426

506 So. 2d 426 (1987) VILLAGE PARK MOBILE HOME ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Corporation, Alice Mallanda, Kenneth Byers and Billie Byers, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS AND MOBILE HOMES, Appellees. No. BK-219. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. January 20, 1987. On Motion for Rehearing May 8, 1987. Nancy A. Trease, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants. John C. Courtney, Deputy Gen. Counsel, and Robin H. ..

3D01-847, 3D00-3521 Lw v. Fla. Dept. of Children and Family Services (2002)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 16, 2002

829 So. 2d 938 (2002) L.W. and P.G., Appellants, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee. Nos. 3D01-847, 3D00-3521. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. October 16, 2002. Rehearing Denied November 27, 2002. Herscher & Herscher and Ilene Herscher, Cora Gables, Gonzalo Alberto Gayoso, Miami, for appellants. Calianne P. Lantz, for appellee. Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ. PER CURIAM. Mother and father appeal orders adjudicating their child dependent..

98-2995 Hogan v. State (1999)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 01, 1999 Citations: 753 So. 2d 570

753 So. 2d 570 (1999) Charles HOGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 98-2995. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. September 1, 1999. Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Christopher A. Haddad, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. KLEIN, J. Appellant was convicted of burglary of a dwelling. He argues th..

04-004151 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs HAVEN OF OUR LADY OF PEACE, INC. (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 17, 2004

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Respondent is guilty of a violation known as a "Class II violation" or "deficiency" and, if so, whether a $2,500.00 fine and conditional licensure status should be imposed upon the Respondent facility.Petitioner did not prove that Respondent failed to provide adequate supervision or protective devices to try to prevent resident`s fall, which occurred in an unforseeable manner and was an isolated incident.

04-001065 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs LAKE LADY LLC, D/B/A LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 2004

In DOAH Case No. 04-0025, the issue is whether the Agency for Health Care Administrative (AHCA) correctly assigned conditional licensure status to Lady Lake NH, L.L.C., d/b/a/ Lady Lake Specialty Care Center (Lady Lake) for the period of August 26, 2003, through October 3, 2003. In DOAH Case No. 04- 1065, the issues are as follows: (a) whether Lady Lake committed a violation of 42 C.F.R. Section 483.25, as it relates to care of patients with or who develop pressure sores; (b) whether Lady Lake committed a violation of 42 C.F.R. Section 483.75, as it relates to clinical records; and (c) if so, what, if any, penalty should be imposed.Respondent provided appropriate care and treatment for a resident`s pre-existing pressure sore and properly maintained his medical records.

04-000025 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs LADY LAKE NH, L.L.C., D/B/A LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2004

In DOAH Case No. 04-0025, the issue is whether the Agency for Health Care Administrative (AHCA) correctly assigned conditional licensure status to Lady Lake NH, L.L.C., d/b/a/ Lady Lake Specialty Care Center (Lady Lake) for the period of August 26, 2003, through October 3, 2003. In DOAH Case No. 04- 1065, the issues are as follows: (a) whether Lady Lake committed a violation of 42 C.F.R. Section 483.25, as it relates to care of patients with or who develop pressure sores; (b) whether Lady Lake committed a violation of 42 C.F.R. Section 483.75, as it relates to clinical records; and (c) if so, what, if any, penalty should be imposed.Respondent provided appropriate care and treatment for a resident`s pre-existing pressure sore and properly maintained his medical records.

04-000524 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs HEBREW HOME OF SOUTH BEACH, INC., D/B/A HEBREW HOME OF SOUTH BEACH (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2004

Whether Respondent, a nursing home, committed the violation alleged in the one-count Administrative Complaint and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Respondent failed to take adequate precautions to prevent a resident`s second elopement, a class II deficiency.

97-001654 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs MEADOWBROOK PARK (BECKY VAN PELT, D/B/A MEADOWBROOK PARK) (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 27, 1997

The issue is whether Petitioner should grant Respondent’s application for a renewal of its limited nursing services license.Assisted Living Facility (ALF) not entitled to limited nursing services license due to negligence in death of demented resident.

02-001420 INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES OF PORT CHARLOTTE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 10, 2002

Whether Petitioner's licensure status should be reduced from standard to conditional.Class II deficiency proven by agency, where excess protein in tube feeding was the likely cause of elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level, and facility failed to monitor BUN level despite resident`s history of azotemia.

00-004710 HORIZON HEALTHCARE AND SPECIALTY CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 17, 2000

Was Petitioner properly cited for a Class III deficiency.Agency claimed nursing home allowed two residents to become dehydrated. Agency failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that residents were dehydrated.

Jonathan S Grout