Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Joseph Charles Hood
Joseph Charles Hood
Visitors: 43
0
Bar #369314(FL)     License for 42 years
Sarasota FL

Are you Joseph Charles Hood? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

91-001510  UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 07, 1991
The central issue in this proceeding is whether Petitioners' applications for Certificates of Need for comprehensive medical rehabilitation beds in HRS District VI should be approved. Facts stipulated by the parties are reflected in the findings of fact. Ancillary issues include whether Manatee Springs Nursing Center, Inc.'s letter of intent complied with the requirements of Section 381.709(2), F.S.; and whether Manatee Springs Nursing Center, Inc.'s and University Community Hospital's applications are incomplete for failure to include a "complete listing of all capital projects", as required by Section 381.707(2), F.S.No need for more comprehensive medical rehabilitation beds in HRS District IV. Both Certificate Of Need applications were defective: Capital PRoject list incomplete and letter of intent defective.
91-005387  ANTHONY R. STARNES vs LEON STEWART TREATMENT CENTER, INC.  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 1991
In June 1989, Leon F. Stewart Treatment Center, Inc. ("Stewart"), advertised to the community that it had a job available as a counselor, for which Anthony R. Starnes ("Starnes") applied. Stewart declined to hire Starnes, who is wheelchair bound. Starnes filed a complaint alleging unlawful employment discrimination with the Florida Commission on Human Relations ("Commission"). On July 25, 1991, the Commission determined that there was no reasonable cause to believe than an unlawful employment practice occurred. Starnes has appealed the determination by the Commission of "no cause" to the Division of Administrative Hearings. The Respondent filed a proposed finding which was read, considered and adopted except for paragraphs 7 and 8. The Petition did not file proposed findings.Petitioner failed to show hiring authority had knowledge of Petitioner's handicap. Authority had nondiscriminatory reason to hire another.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer