Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Dec. 08, 2005
The issues in this bid protest are whether Intervenor's bid materially deviated from the project specifications and, if so, whether Respondent's preliminary decision to award Intervenor the construction contract at issue was clearly erroneous, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to competition.Intervenor`s bid did not materially deviate from the project specifications. Thus, Respondent`s preliminary decision to award Intervenor the construction contract at issue was not clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious or contrary to competition.
