The issue is whether Respondent's preliminary decision to negotiate a contract with Intervenor to provide construction manager at risk services for renovations at two elementary schools is contrary to statutes, rules, policies, or the request for qualifications, in violation of Section 120.57(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2009).Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent's ranking of Intervenor number one to commence negotiating a contract for construction manager at risk services is arbitrary, capricious, contrary to competition, or clearly erroneous.
