Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Joy Heath
Joy Heath
Visitors: 46
0
Bar #593508(FL)     License for 38 years
Vero Beach FL

Are you Joy Heath? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

88-000386  CITRUS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BOARD OF TRUSTEES vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 29, 1989
The issues concern the question of the entitlement of Petitioner to the grant of a certificate of need (CON) to provide home health services in District III.Passage of a home health rule after the application was filed but before hearing not controlling. Case decided on its peculiar facts.
87-003409  MANOR CARE OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A MANOR CARE OF PALM HARBOR vs. MAPLE LEAF OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 14, 1988
These proceedings result from the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services' ("DHRS") denial of the applications for certificate of need ("CON") to construct community nursing home beds in Hillsborough County submitted in the January, 1987, batching cycle by Forum Group, Inc., Sponsor of Retirement Living of Hillsborough County ("Forum"), Hillsborough Healthcare, Ltd., d/b/a Convalescent Nursing Center of Hillsborough County ("HHL"), Manor Care of Florida, Inc., d/b/a Manor Care of Hillsborough County ("Manor Care"), Cypress Total Care ("Cypress"), Palm Court Nursing Home ("Palm Court"), and other applicants who subsequently voluntarily dismissed their petitions before final hearing, and their respective challenges to the DHRS preliminary approval of: Florida Country Place, Ltd., ("FCP"), for 30 beds; THA/Oxford Senior Living Ventures, d/b/a Oxford Hillsborough Nursing Associates ("VHA/Oxford"), for 120 beds; and Health Care and Retirement Corporation of America ("HCR"), for 120 beds. VHA/Oxford voluntarily dismissed its application on the record during the first day of the final hearing.Error w/numeric bed need insubstantial. Considering all criteria (ie serious errors on denied apps), HRS properly granted CONs among competing parties.
87-003447  MANOR CARE OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A MANOR CARE OF PALM HARBOR vs. OFFICE OF COMMUNITY MEDICAL FACILITIES, HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 03, 1988
Competing CONs for community nursing home beds were allowed to ""update"" apps (over HRS's objections) since SAAR changed. RO that 7 of 8 CONs be granted.
87-003477  MANOR HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, AMERICANA HEALTHCARE CENTER OF JACKSONVILLE vs. BUREAU OF COMMUNITY MEDICAL FACILITIES AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 24, 1988
The issues raised concern the questions of whether Manor Care should be entitled to the grant of a certificate of need for the addition of 31 nursing home beds to its existing facility which presently houses 89 beds, in Subdistrict 3 to HRS District IV, and whether All Saints should be granted permission to transfer its existing 60 bed nursing home facility from Subdistrict 2 to Subdistrict 3 within HRS District IV by grant of a certificate of need.Nursing home bed applications involves attempt to move to new sub-district where beds are not needed. Recommend denial.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer