Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Dec. 19, 1990
Whether the intended award of the lease to Rouse and Associates should be set aside due to the competitive advantages obtained by this bidder prior to the submission of sealed proposals. Whether the consensus decision making approach used by the committee caused an unfair result when the evaluation criteria was reviewed. Whether the responses to the request for bid proposals in RFP No. 045-91 were arbitrarily evaluated by the review committee charged with the responsibility to make the evaluation on behalf of the user agency. Whether the Petitioner, Peter Tsokos, was the lowest responsive bidder who should be granted the award. Whether the current Notice of Intended Award should be approved.Consensus decision approach by agency did not negatively impact bidders possible unfairness not established by protestant.
