welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Kala Kelly Shankle
Kala Kelly Shankle
Kala Kelly Shankle
Visitors: 42
0
Bar #112042(FL)     License for 11 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Kala Kelly Shankle? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 119.011, 119.07, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.541, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 120.80, 2.01, 393.0661, 395.1031, 395.3025, 395.40, 395.4001, 395.401, 395.4015, 395.402, 395.4025, 395.403, 395.4045, 395.405, 408.031, 408.034, 408.035, 408.039, 408.045, 408.0455, 408.15, 550.002, 550.0251, 550.0745, 550.0951, 550.105, 550.155, 550.3551, 550.70, 57.111, 849.01, 849.08, 849.085, 849.086, 849.25, 943.05, 943.051

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.103, 28-106.108

5D16-2875  Ronald Norris v. State  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 28, 2016
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED RONALD NORRIS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-2875 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed December 2, 2016 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Clyde E. Wolfe, Judge. Ronald Norris, Bristol, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Ronald Norris appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Proced..
  French v. Turner  (1931)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 07, 1931 Citations: 103 Fla. 425, 137 So. 521
This case comes here on writ of error to a judgment in habeas corpus proceedings quashing the writ of habeas corpus on the ground that petitioner was at the time in the custody of a Federal officer under a capias issued in a Federal criminal case. The petitioner attempted to gain his release from the custody of the Sheriff of Broward County, whom the petitioner alleged unlawfully held him under a capias issued from the Circuit Court of Broward County on an indictment returned after the running of..
5D14-2134  Bowmar v. Suntrust  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 18, 2016
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CHRISTINA D. BOWMAR, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D14-2134 SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., ET AL., Appellees. _/ Opinion filed April 22, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Robert J. Pleus, Jr., Senior Judge. Christina D. Bowmar, Longwood, pro se. Michael W. Smith, of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Orlando, f..
15-5783  Ronald Gene Shingler Jr. v. State of Florida  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 04, 2016
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RONALD GENE SHINGLER JR., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-5783 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed April 5, 2016. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Clay County. Don H. Lester, Judge. Ronald Gene Shingler Jr., pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, ..
15-007010RP  DANIA ENTERTAINMENT CENTER, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007011RP  DAYTONA BEACH KENNEL CLUB, INC, vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007012RP  JACKSONVILLE KENNEL CLUB, INC, vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007013RP  MELBOURNE GREYHOUND PARK, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007014RP  BONITA-FORT MYERS CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007015RP  INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF PALM BEACH vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer