welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Karen B. Parker
Karen B. Parker
Karen B. Parker
Visitors: 39
0
Bar #54482(FL)     License for 17 years; Member in Good Standing
Miami FL

Are you Karen B. Parker? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-0574  Vincent Charo v. State of Florida  (2018)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 04, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D18-0574 _ VINCENT CHARO, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _ Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction. June 4, 2018 PER CURIAM. Any arguments related to the competency order that Petitioner seeks to belatedly appeal in this proceeding are properly raised in the timely appeal in case number 1D18-0601. Accordingly, the petition for belated appeal is hereby dismissed. WETHERELL, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur. _ Not final u..
15-2638  Harris v. State  (2015)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 23, 2015
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 23, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D15-2638 Lower Tribunal No. 00-35187A _ Terence Harris, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge Rodriguez-Chomat, Judge. Terence Harris, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee. Before WELLS, ROTHEN..
93-000314EC  IN RE: DONALD B. PARKER vs *  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 25, 1993
On January 29, 1992, the Florida Commission on Ethics issued its Order Finding Probable Cause that Respondent violated section 112.3143(3), F.S. by voting to approve payment to C.W. Roberts Contracting Company for work done on a county road paving contract for which Capital Asphalt, Inc., his employer at the time the vote was taken, was a subcontractor. The issue is whether that violation occurred and if so, what discipline or penalty is appropriate.No proof that respondent knew he was voting on a measure which inured to the special benefit of his employer-dismissal recommended.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer