Orange FL Lawyers | Karen L Goldsmith -- eLawyers

96-3399, 96-3625 HUNZINGER CONST. v. Quarles & Brady (1999)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 30, 1999 Citations: 735 So. 2d 589

735 So. 2d 589 (1999) HUNZINGER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and Hunzinger Construction Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Appellants, v. QUARLES & BRADY General Partnership, Appellee. Nos. 96-3399, 96-3625. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 30, 1999. *591 Charles H. Damsel, Jr. of Damsel & Gelston, P.A., West Palm Beach and Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Marjorie Gadarian Graham, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellants. Margaret L. Cooper of Jones, Foste..

72-1017 Bernard v. State (1973)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 20, 1973 Citations: 275 So. 2d 34

275 So. 2d 34 (1973) Richard BERNARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 72-1017. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 20, 1973. Rehearing Denied April 6, 1973. *35 Huysman, Engel & Gold, Coral Gables, for appellant. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Sheridan Weinstein, Legal Intern, for appellee. Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ. PER CURIAM. The defendant appeals his conviction for violation of § 398.0..

1D08-1059 Gary v. State (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 2008 Citations: 997 So. 2d 408

997 So. 2d 408 (2008) GARY v. STATE. No. 1D08-1059. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 10, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

3D05-2137 State v. Garcia (2006)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 28, 2006 Citations: 935 So. 2d 542

935 So. 2d 542 (2006) STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner, v. Jose GARCIA, Respondent. No. 3D05-2137. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 28, 2006. Rehearing Denied August 18, 2006. *543 Enoch J. Whitney, General Counsel, and Carlos J. Raurell, Assistant General Counsel, for petitioner. Hersch & Talisman and Richard Hersch, Miami, for respondent. Before LEVY, SHEPHERD, and ROTHENBERG, JJ. ROTHENBERG, Judge. The State of Florida, Depa..

06-001131 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES, INC., D/B/A WESTMINSTER OAKS (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 30, 2006

Whether Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what sanction(s), if any, should be imposed.No evidence was presented that showed that the residents were not receiving adequate supervision in keeping them away from harmful situations. Recommend that the Administrative Complaint be dismissed.

04-004151 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs HAVEN OF OUR LADY OF PEACE, INC. (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 17, 2004

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Respondent is guilty of a violation known as a "Class II violation" or "deficiency" and, if so, whether a $2,500.00 fine and conditional licensure status should be imposed upon the Respondent facility.Petitioner did not prove that Respondent failed to provide adequate supervision or protective devices to try to prevent resident`s fall, which occurred in an unforseeable manner and was an isolated incident.

02-000669 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs WESTMINSTER COMMUNITY CARE SERVICES, INC., D/B/A WESTMINSTER CARE OF ORLANDO (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 15, 2002

The issue in these cases is whether Respondent failed to provide appropriate emergency care for a nursing home resident in respiratory distress in violation of 42 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Section 483.25 and Florida Administrative Code Rule 59A-4.1288. (All references to rules are to rules promulgated in the Florida Administrative Code in effect as of the date of this Recommended Order.)Facility did not fail to provide respiratory care to patient who pulled out trach tube when facility nurse restored airway but did not provide CPR before EMT arrived on scene.

04-001065 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs LAKE LADY LLC, D/B/A LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 2004

In DOAH Case No. 04-0025, the issue is whether the Agency for Health Care Administrative (AHCA) correctly assigned conditional licensure status to Lady Lake NH, L.L.C., d/b/a/ Lady Lake Specialty Care Center (Lady Lake) for the period of August 26, 2003, through October 3, 2003. In DOAH Case No. 04- 1065, the issues are as follows: (a) whether Lady Lake committed a violation of 42 C.F.R. Section 483.25, as it relates to care of patients with or who develop pressure sores; (b) whether Lady Lake committed a violation of 42 C.F.R. Section 483.75, as it relates to clinical records; and (c) if so, what, if any, penalty should be imposed.Respondent provided appropriate care and treatment for a resident`s pre-existing pressure sore and properly maintained his medical records.

04-000025 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs LADY LAKE NH, L.L.C., D/B/A LADY LAKE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2004

In DOAH Case No. 04-0025, the issue is whether the Agency for Health Care Administrative (AHCA) correctly assigned conditional licensure status to Lady Lake NH, L.L.C., d/b/a/ Lady Lake Specialty Care Center (Lady Lake) for the period of August 26, 2003, through October 3, 2003. In DOAH Case No. 04- 1065, the issues are as follows: (a) whether Lady Lake committed a violation of 42 C.F.R. Section 483.25, as it relates to care of patients with or who develop pressure sores; (b) whether Lady Lake committed a violation of 42 C.F.R. Section 483.75, as it relates to clinical records; and (c) if so, what, if any, penalty should be imposed.Respondent provided appropriate care and treatment for a resident`s pre-existing pressure sore and properly maintained his medical records.

04-001578 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs SHADY REST CARE PAVILION, INC., D/B/A SHADY REST CARE PAVILION (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 27, 2004

The issues in the case are whether the allegations set forth in the Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.There was no evidence that inclusion of pain management in the "activity of daily living" plan violated any existing requirement and no evidence that provision of additional medication would have increased physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being.

Karen L Goldsmith