Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Katherine A Heffner
Katherine A Heffner
Visitors: 55
0
Bar #112955(FL)     License for 11 years
Tampa FL

Are you Katherine A Heffner? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-000147  MARCELLA TAGGART vs PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 13, 2016
The issue in the case is whether Marcella Taggart (Petitioner) was the subject of unlawful discrimination by Publix Super Markets, Inc. (Respondent), in violation of chapter 760, Florida Statutes.Petitioner's termination from employment was based on dishonesty and not discriminatory.
19-003380TTS  BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs DAGOBERTO MAGANA-VELASQUEZ  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 2019
(1) Whether just cause exists, pursuant to section 1012.33, Florida Statutes,2 for Petitioner to suspend Respondent from his employment as a teacher for ten days without pay in Case No. 19-3380; and (2) whether just cause exists, pursuant to section 1012.33, for Petitioner to terminate Respondent's employment as a teacher in Case No. 19-3381.Just cause demonstrated, by preponderance of the evidence, to terminate teacher's employment.
19-003381TTS  BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs DAGOBERTO MAGANA-VELASQUEZ  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 2019
(1) Whether just cause exists, pursuant to section 1012.33, Florida Statutes,2 for Petitioner to suspend Respondent from his employment as a teacher for ten days without pay in Case No. 19-3380; and (2) whether just cause exists, pursuant to section 1012.33, for Petitioner to terminate Respondent's employment as a teacher in Case No. 19-3381.Just cause demonstrated, by preponderance of the evidence, to terminate teacher's employment.
20-002019TTS  LEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs LAURA LICATA  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 23, 2020
The issue to resolve is whether just cause exists to terminate Respondent’s employment as a classroom teacher.Petitioner proved that Respondent committed misconduct in office by misappropriating funds contributed by students to participate in theatrical events. Termination of employment was recommended.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer