Leon FL Lawyers | Kathrin Francesca Plendl -- eLawyers

93-006437 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs HERNANDO L. DEL CASTILLO (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 03, 1993

The issue in this case is whether Respondent is guilty of gross or repeated malpractice or the failure to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment that is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove a deviation from applicable standard of care by Respondent who performed a successful caesarian only after five hours` labor and who performed a successful cerclage at 32 weeks` gestation.

92-003479 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs RAUL A. TAMAYO (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 09, 1992

This is a license discipline case in which the Petitioner seeks to have disciplinary action taken against the Respondent on the basis of allegations that the Respondent has violated paragraphs (f), (w), and (aa), of Section 485.331(1), Florida Statutes, by aiding, assisting, procuring or advising an unlicensed person to practice medicine, by delegating professional responsibilities to a person when the licensee knew such person was unlicensed, and by presigning blank prescription forms.Evidence insufficient to show violation of paragraph (f) or (w) of Sec. 458.331(1) F.S. Evidence shows violation of pargh (aa). Mitigation of penalty discussed.

93-002632F JORGE ARTURO FLORES vs BOARD OF MEDICINE (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 12, 1993

Whether Petitioner is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Section 57.111, Florida Statutes, for fees and costs he incurred as a result of his participation in the administrative proceeding Respondent initiated against him in DPR Case Numbers 01-11408 and 89-07347 (DOAH Case No. 92-4948)?No right to fee award where Petitioner didn't show he was small business party ajd the filing of formal charges against Petitioner were sustantially justified at time of filing.

93-001553 BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE vs BENJAMIN D. GOLDBERG (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 1993

The issue in this case is whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are correct and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Doctor's drug addiction poses threat to public health, license revoked.

91-004549 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs R. DEWITT JONES (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 19, 1991

The ultimate issue is whether the medical license of Respondent, R. Dewitt Jones, M.D. (Jones), should be revoked or otherwise penalized based on the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint.DPR loses for failure to identify and introduce documents reviewed and relied on by expert and for expert's inability to identify standard of cure.

91-006669 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JAYAPRAKASH KAMATH (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 1991

The issues for determination in this case are whether the Board of Medicine should discipline the Respondent, Jayaprakash Kamath, M.D., on charges set out in the Administrative Complaint, DPR Case No. 89-8841. Specifically, the Administrative Complaint charges that the Respondent was guilty of gross or repeated malpractice or failure to practice medicine with that level of care, skill and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances and that he failed to keep written medical records justifying the course of treatment of a patient, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(m) and (t), Fla. Stat. (1991)--and, if so, what discipline is appropriate.Doctor treated and discharged 23-hour hospital patient without reading Xrays or getting radiologist's report: violation of 458.331(1)(t).

91-004031 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs STEPHEN C. ROOKS (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 27, 1991

The issue in this case is whether Respondent has been convicted or found guilty of a crime directly relating to the practice of respiratory care or his ability to practice respiratory care and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Recommended $1000 fine and five-year probation for respiratory therapist who bruised ex-girlfriend in jealous rage.

00-000436 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE vs BEN A. RAINES, D.O. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 26, 2000

Kathrin Francesca Plendl