Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Katie Sellers Buchanan
Katie Sellers Buchanan
Visitors: 35
0
Bar #14196(FL)     License for 19 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Katie Sellers Buchanan? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

09-003330  PASCO CWHIP PARTNERS, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 17, 2009
The threshold issue in this case is whether the decisions giving rise to the dispute, which concern the allocation and disbursement of funds appropriated to Respondent by the legislature and thus involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are subject to quasi-judicial adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act. If the Division of Administrative Hearings were possessed of subject matter jurisdiction, then the issues would be whether Respondent is estopped from implementing its intended decisions to "de- obligate" itself from preliminary commitments to provide low- interest loans to several projects approved for funding under the Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program; and whether such intended decisions would constitute breaches of contract or otherwise be erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or abuses of the agency's discretion.The decisions giving rise to this dispute, which involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are not subject to quasi-judicial adjudication. It is therefore recommended that these cases be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
09-003332  LEGACY POINTE, INC. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 17, 2009
The threshold issue in this case is whether the decisions giving rise to the dispute, which concern the allocation and disbursement of funds appropriated to Respondent by the legislature and thus involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are subject to quasi-judicial adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act. If the Division of Administrative Hearings were possessed of subject matter jurisdiction, then the issues would be whether Respondent is estopped from implementing its intended decisions to "de- obligate" itself from preliminary commitments to provide low- interest loans to several projects approved for funding under the Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program; and whether such intended decisions would constitute breaches of contract or otherwise be erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or abuses of the agency's discretion.The decisions giving rise to this dispute, which involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are not subject to quasi-judicial adjudication. It is therefore recommended that these cases be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
09-003333  VILLA CAPRI, INC. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 17, 2009
The threshold issue in this case is whether the decisions giving rise to the dispute, which concern the allocation and disbursement of funds appropriated to Respondent by the legislature and thus involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are subject to quasi-judicial adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act. If the Division of Administrative Hearings were possessed of subject matter jurisdiction, then the issues would be whether Respondent is estopped from implementing its intended decisions to "de- obligate" itself from preliminary commitments to provide low- interest loans to several projects approved for funding under the Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program; and whether such intended decisions would constitute breaches of contract or otherwise be erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or abuses of the agency's discretion.The decisions giving rise to this dispute, which involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are not subject to quasi-judicial adjudication. It is therefore recommended that these cases be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
09-003334  PRIME HOMEBUILDERS vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 17, 2009
The threshold issue in this case is whether the decisions giving rise to the dispute, which concern the allocation and disbursement of funds appropriated to Respondent by the legislature and thus involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are subject to quasi-judicial adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act. If the Division of Administrative Hearings were possessed of subject matter jurisdiction, then the issues would be whether Respondent is estopped from implementing its intended decisions to "de- obligate" itself from preliminary commitments to provide low- interest loans to several projects approved for funding under the Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program; and whether such intended decisions would constitute breaches of contract or otherwise be erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or abuses of the agency's discretion.The decisions giving rise to this dispute, which involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are not subject to quasi-judicial adjudication. It is therefore recommended that these cases be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
09-003335  PRIME HOMEBUILDERS vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 17, 2009
The threshold issue in this case is whether the decisions giving rise to the dispute, which concern the allocation and disbursement of funds appropriated to Respondent by the legislature and thus involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are subject to quasi-judicial adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act. If the Division of Administrative Hearings were possessed of subject matter jurisdiction, then the issues would be whether Respondent is estopped from implementing its intended decisions to "de- obligate" itself from preliminary commitments to provide low- interest loans to several projects approved for funding under the Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program; and whether such intended decisions would constitute breaches of contract or otherwise be erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or abuses of the agency's discretion.The decisions giving rise to this dispute, which involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are not subject to quasi-judicial adjudication. It is therefore recommended that these cases be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
09-003336  PRIME HOMEBUILDERS vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 17, 2009
The threshold issue in this case is whether the decisions giving rise to the dispute, which concern the allocation and disbursement of funds appropriated to Respondent by the legislature and thus involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are subject to quasi-judicial adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act. If the Division of Administrative Hearings were possessed of subject matter jurisdiction, then the issues would be whether Respondent is estopped from implementing its intended decisions to "de- obligate" itself from preliminary commitments to provide low- interest loans to several projects approved for funding under the Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program; and whether such intended decisions would constitute breaches of contract or otherwise be erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or abuses of the agency's discretion.The decisions giving rise to this dispute, which involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are not subject to quasi-judicial adjudication. It is therefore recommended that these cases be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
09-004031  MDG CAPITAL CORPORATION vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2009
The threshold issue in this case is whether the decisions giving rise to the dispute, which concern the allocation and disbursement of funds appropriated to Respondent by the legislature and thus involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are subject to quasi-judicial adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act. If the Division of Administrative Hearings were possessed of subject matter jurisdiction, then the issues would be whether Respondent is estopped from implementing its intended decisions to "de- obligate" itself from preliminary commitments to provide low- interest loans to several projects approved for funding under the Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program; and whether such intended decisions would constitute breaches of contract or otherwise be erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or abuses of the agency's discretion.The decisions giving rise to this dispute, which involve the preparation or modification of the agency's budget, are not subject to quasi-judicial adjudication. It is therefore recommended that these cases be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer