welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Kealey Anna West
Kealey Anna West
Kealey Anna West
Visitors: 62
0
Bar #611611(FL)     License for 23 years
Jacksonville FL

Are you Kealey Anna West? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

17-002543RE  ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER, FLORIDA DEFENDERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT, SILVER SPRINGS ALLIANCE, AND ALICE GARDINER vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 28, 2017
The issue to be determined is whether St. Johns River Water Management District Emergency Rule 40CER17-01 constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.The Emergency Rule establishing minimum flows and levels for Silver Springs is not arbitrary or capricious or otherwise an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
16-006165  INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT vs ALL ABOARD FLORIDA - OPERATIONS, LLC; RAM LAND HOLDINGS, LLC; J. ACQUISITIONS BREVARD, LLC; AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 20, 2016
The issue to be determined in this case is whether All Aboard Florida – Operations, LLC (“the Applicant”); Ram Land Holdings, LLC (“RLH”); and J. Acquisitions Brevard, LLC (“JAB”), are entitled to the Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District (“SJRWMD”) for construction and operation of certain railway facilities within the portion of the Florida East Coast Railway corridor known as Segment D08 (the “Project”).Petitioner did not demonstrate that the new bridges would cause flooding that would not already occur during a 100-year storm because of the height of the existing bridges.
14-003904  TOMM FRIEND; DEREK LAMONTAGNE; TURNBULL COMMUNITY, INC.; AND FRIENDS OF SPRUCE CREEK PRESERVE, INC. vs PIONEER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2014
The issue to be determined in this case is whether Pioneer Community Development District (“Pioneer”) is entitled to an individual environmental resource permit (“ERP”) from St. Johns River Water Management District (“District”) for construction of a proposed road.Petitioners failed to prove that Pioneer CDD was not entitled to the environmental resource permit for the proposed extension of Williamson Boulevard in the City of Port Orange.
08-004201  CITY OF GROVELAND AND LAKE COUNTY vs NIAGARA BOTTLING COMPANY, LLC, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 2008
The issue in this case is whether Niagara Bottling Company, LLC (Niagara), is entitled to Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) No. 114010 issued by the St. Johns River Water Management District (District), which authorizes Niagara to withdraw and use 484,000 gallons per day (gpd) of groundwater to produce bottled water at a facility in Lake County.Niagara demonstrated that it was entitled to the comsumptive water use permit. In consumptive use permitting under Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, the public interest inquiry is limited to matters affecting the water resources.
05-003662  PHILLIP LOTT vs CITY OF DELTONA AND ST. JOHNS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2005
This case involves a challenge to St. Johns River Water Management District’s (District or SJRWMD) intended issuance of an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) granting the City's Application No. 4-127-97380-1, for the construction and operation of a surface water management system for a retrofit flood-relief project known as Drysdale Drive/Chapel Drive Drainage Improvements consisting of: excavation of the Drysdale Drive pond (Pond 1); improvement to the outfall at Sterling Lake; and the interconnection of Pond 1 and four existing drainage retention areas through a combination of pump stations and gravity outfalls (project or system). The issue is whether the applicant, the City of Deltona (City or Deltona), has provided reasonable assurance the system complies with the water quantity, environmental, and water quality criteria of the District’s ERP regulations set forth in Chapter 40C-4, Florida Administrative Code,1 and the Applicant’s Handbook: Management and Storage of Surface Waters (2005) (A.H.).2Respondent, City of Deltona, provided reasonable assurance that its flood control retrofit project met all permitting criteria.
05-003664  STEVEN L. SPRATT vs CITY OF DELTONA AND ST. JOHNS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2005
This case involves a challenge to St. Johns River Water Management District’s (District or SJRWMD) intended issuance of an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) granting the City's Application No. 4-127-97380-1, for the construction and operation of a surface water management system for a retrofit flood-relief project known as Drysdale Drive/Chapel Drive Drainage Improvements consisting of: excavation of the Drysdale Drive pond (Pond 1); improvement to the outfall at Sterling Lake; and the interconnection of Pond 1 and four existing drainage retention areas through a combination of pump stations and gravity outfalls (project or system). The issue is whether the applicant, the City of Deltona (City or Deltona), has provided reasonable assurance the system complies with the water quantity, environmental, and water quality criteria of the District’s ERP regulations set forth in Chapter 40C-4, Florida Administrative Code,1 and the Applicant’s Handbook: Management and Storage of Surface Waters (2005) (A.H.).2Respondent, City of Deltona, provided reasonable assurance that its flood control retrofit project met all permitting criteria.
04-002400  DIANA E. BAUER vs CITY OF DELTONA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 2004
The issue is whether the applicant for an Environmental Resource Permit ("ERP"), the City of Deltona ("City" or "Applicant"), has provided reasonable assurance that the system proposed complies with the water quantity, environmental, and water quality criteria of the St. Johns River Water Management District's ("District") ERP regulations set forth in Florida Administrative Code Chapter 40C-4, and the Applicant's Handbook: Management and Storage of Surface Waters (2005).Respondent, applicant for an environmental resource permit (ERP) provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Florida Administrative Code Rules 40C-4.301 and 302 have been met so as to entitle it to the ERP.
04-002404  FRANCELL FREI vs CITY OF DELTONA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 2004
The issue is whether the applicant for an Environmental Resource Permit ("ERP"), the City of Deltona ("City" or "Applicant"), has provided reasonable assurance that the system proposed complies with the water quantity, environmental, and water quality criteria of the St. Johns River Water Management District's ("District") ERP regulations set forth in Florida Administrative Code Chapter 40C-4, and the Applicant's Handbook: Management and Storage of Surface Waters (2005).Respondent, applicant for an environmental resource permit (ERP) provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Florida Administrative Code Rules 40C-4.301 and 302 have been met so as to entitle it to the ERP.
04-002405  GARY JENSEN vs CITY OF DELTONA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 2004
The issue is whether the applicant for an Environmental Resource Permit ("ERP"), the City of Deltona ("City" or "Applicant"), has provided reasonable assurance that the system proposed complies with the water quantity, environmental, and water quality criteria of the St. Johns River Water Management District's ("District") ERP regulations set forth in Florida Administrative Code Chapter 40C-4, and the Applicant's Handbook: Management and Storage of Surface Waters (2005).Respondent, applicant for an environmental resource permit (ERP) provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Florida Administrative Code Rules 40C-4.301 and 302 have been met so as to entitle it to the ERP.
04-002406  PHILLIP LOTT vs CITY OF DELTONA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 2004
The issue is whether the applicant for an Environmental Resource Permit ("ERP"), the City of Deltona ("City" or "Applicant"), has provided reasonable assurance that the system proposed complies with the water quantity, environmental, and water quality criteria of the St. Johns River Water Management District's ("District") ERP regulations set forth in Florida Administrative Code Chapter 40C-4, and the Applicant's Handbook: Management and Storage of Surface Waters (2005).Respondent, applicant for an environmental resource permit (ERP) provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Florida Administrative Code Rules 40C-4.301 and 302 have been met so as to entitle it to the ERP.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer