Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Kenneth P Tinkham
Kenneth P Tinkham
Visitors: 24
0
Bar #29686(FL)     License for 18 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Kenneth P Tinkham? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

11-005827RU  GUARANTEE TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY vs FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION AND OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 15, 2011
Whether the Amended Notice and Order to Show Cause issued in DOAH Case Number 11-1150, with which this unadopted rule challenge is now consolidated, contains an agency statement that comes within the definition of a rule but has not been adopted through rulemaking procedures, in violation of section 120.54(1)(a), Florida Statutes, and if so, whether costs and attorney’s fees should be awarded.Administrative Complaint alleging that facts constitute a facial violation of a statute is not a statement of agency policy and does not constitute an unadopted rule; the Petition is dismissed.
11-001150  OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION vs GUARANTEE TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 03, 2011
Whether Respondent has violated sections 627.6675, 626.9541(1)(a)1., 626.9541(1)(a)6., or 626.9541(1)(b), Florida Statutes, as pled in the Amended Notice and Order to Show Cause, and if so, what is the appropriate penalty.A termination letter that misleadingly informed of guaranteed issue policies but not conversion rights violated the Unfair Insurance Trade Practice Act, but other charges were not proved by clear and convincing evidence.
12-000439  PREMIER GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY vs OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 2012
The issues to be resolved in this case are what amount of federal income tax expense is properly included as an expense in Premier's excessive profits filings for the years 2005-2007, and in light of that deduction, how much Petitioner must refund as excessive profits pursuant to section 627.215, Florida Statutes (2009)?Petitioner demonstrated a reasonable methodology for allocation of federal income tax expense for purposes of excess profit reporting pursuant to Section 627.215.
12-002938F  PREMIER GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY vs OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION AND THE FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 11, 2012
The issue to be determined is the amount of attorneys' fees and costs to be awarded to Petitioner pursuant to section 120.595(4), Florida Statutes (2011).Petitioner is entitled to attorneys' fees and costs as the prevailing party in a challenge to an unadopted rule.
12-001201RU  PREMIER GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY vs OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION AND THE FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 04, 2012
At issue in this case is whether Respondents, the Office of Insurance Regulation ("OIR" or "the Office") or the Financial Services Commission ("the Commission") have developed agency statements of general applicability meeting the definition of a rule in section 120.52(10), Florida Statutes (2011), governing its review, evaluation, recalculation, and disposition of excessive profits filings submitted pursuant to section 627.215, Florida Statutes (2011). If so, it must be determined whether those statements have been adopted as rules pursuant to the rulemaking process in section 120.54(1).Petitioner demonstrated that Office's policy of not allowing federal income tax as an expense for excess profits filings meets the definition a rule that has not been deopted pursuant to Section 120.54.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer