Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Kevin David Johnson
Kevin David Johnson
Visitors: 44
0
Bar #13749(FL)     License for 30 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you Kevin David Johnson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-004412  MARIE L. HENRY vs THE FLORIDA BAR  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 03, 2016
Whether Petitioner, Marie L. Henry, was subject to an unlawful discriminatory act by Respondent, The Florida Bar, based on her race and disability and through retaliation in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act.Petitioner failed to establish jurisdiction to file a discrimination claim under the Florida Civil Rights Act. Furthermore, Petitioner failed to prove that she was subject to unlawful discrimination by Respondent.
02-13688  Juan De Leon v. Comcar Industries, Inc., a Florida Corporation  (2003)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Feb. 18, 2003 Citations: 321 F.3d 1289
321 F.3d 1289 Juan De LEON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMCAR INDUSTRIES, INC., A Florida corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 02-13688. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. February 18, 2003. Merette Leigh Oweis, DiCesare, Davidson & Barker, PA, Lakeland, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. John W. Bencivenga, William E. Sizemore, Kevin David Johnson, Thompson, Sizemore & Gonzalez, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of..
20-002539  MARLENA SEENAUGHT vs MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL, BAYCARE  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2020
The issue in this case is whether Morton Plant Hospital, Baycare (Morton Plant Hospital or Respondent), committed an unlawful employment 1 All statutory references are to Florida Statutes (2019). Relevant provisions of chapter 760, Florida Statutes, have been unchanged since 2015, prior to any allegedly discriminatory acts. practice against Marlena Seenaught (Ms. Seenaught or Petitioner), on the basis of her sex and in retaliation for engaging in a protected activity, in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA).Petitioner failed to establish she was subjected to severe and pervasive sexual harassment for which Respondent was liable or that her termination was in retaliation for complaining about the harassment.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer