welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. L Lee Williams, Jr.
L Lee Williams, Jr.
L Lee Williams, Jr.
Visitors: 30
0
Bar #176926(FL)     License for 51 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you L Lee Williams, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-4009  JIMMY JERMAINE BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA  (2019)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2019
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JIMMY JERMAINE BROWN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4009 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _) Opinion filed October 2, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Jalal A. Harb, Judge. Jimmy Jermaine Brown, pro se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
76-4089  United States v. David Ray Bryant, Michael Dennis Riker, Edward Stillman, Waylon Dwight Perry, Irvin Campbell, Leslie Ledon Smith  (1977)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: Dec. 01, 1977 Citations: 563 F.2d 1227
563 F.2d 1227 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Ray BRYANT, Michael Dennis Riker, Edward Stillman, Waylon Dwight Perry, Irvin Campbell, Leslie Ledon Smith, Defendants-Appellants. No. 76-4089. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Dec. 1, 1977. Stephen Lindsey Gorman, Tallahassee, Fla. (Court-appointed), for bryant. Michael W. Dugger, Tallahassee, Fla. (Court-appointed), for Riker. D. Stephen Kahn, Tallahassee, Fla. (Court-appointed), for Stillman. C. Gary Williams, T..
73876  PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N v. Fuller  (1989)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 16, 1989 Citations: 551 So. 2d 1210
551 So. 2d 1210 (1989) PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. Honorable Richard S. FULLER, et al., Respondents. No. 73876. Supreme Court of Florida. November 16, 1989. Susan F. Clark, Gen. Counsel, and William H. Harrold, Associate Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for petitioner. Michael E. Watkins, City Atty., City of Homestead, Homestead, and L. Lee Williams, Jr. and Frederick M. Bryant of Moore, Williams, Bryant, Peebles & Gautier, P.A., Tallahassee, for respondents. J. Christian Meffert and Wilt..
SC91820  City of Homestead v. Johnson  (2000)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Mar. 16, 2000 Citations: 760 So. 2d 80
760 So. 2d 80 (2000) CITY OF HOMESTEAD, Appellant, v. Julia L. JOHNSON, etc., et al., Appellees. No. SC91820. Supreme Court of Florida. March 16, 2000. *81 L. Lee Williams, Jr. of Williams & Gautier, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellant. Robert D. Vandiver, General Counsel, and Diana W. Caldwell, Associate General Counsel, Florida Public Service Commission, Tallahassee, Florida; Mark K. Logan of Smith, Ballard & Logan, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida; and Wilton R. Miller of Bryant, Miller & Oliv..
90-2337, 90-2320, 90-2893 and 91-1  Makowski v. Makowski  (1993)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 23, 1993 Citations: 613 So. 2d 924
613 So. 2d 924 (1993) Frank MAKOWSKI, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Julia B. MAKOWSKI, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 90-2337, 90-2320, 90-2893 and 91-1. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 26, 1993. Rehearing Granted in Part, Opinion Amended in Part March 23, 1993. *925 Elser, Greene & Hodor, P.A., and Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Elizabeth S. Baker, P.A., Miami, for appellee. Before JORGENSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ. PER CURIAM. These are four consolidated app..
94-002043DRI  BEN JOHNSON AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. vs FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 14, 1994
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Petitioners should obtain an amendment to a development order which would allow multi-family residential development on the property of the Petitioners, presently designated as commercial property, on St. George Island, Franklin County, Florida. Included within that general issue are questions involving whether the proposed amendment is a "substantial deviation" from that 1977 development order, what vested rights, if any, the Petitioners have to develop their property, and whether the development, as proposed and as delineated in the testimony and evidence, is consistent with the development order and any vested rights thus acquired by the Petitioners.Petitioner showed amend to Development of Regional Impact do justify because condo and multi-family residence. Less intensive use not substantial deviate from original development order commercial. designation

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer