welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  7. Laura Anne Olson
Laura Anne Olson
Laura Anne Olson
Visitors: 66
14

Free consultations

Bar #530(FL)     License for 30 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you Laura Anne Olson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Bankruptcy No. 89-8191-8P1  In Re Bicoastal Corp.  (1990)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 1990 Citations: 117 B.R. 696
117 B.R. 696 (1990) In re BICOASTAL CORPORATION, f/k/a The Singer Company, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 89-8191-8P1. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. July 5, 1990. Harley Riedel, Tampa, Fla., Donald Engle, St. Paul, Minn., Robert Wheeler, Chicago, Ill., for debtor. Francis Cobb, Tampa, Fla., William Goldman, New York City, for Unsecured Creditor's Committee. Dean Gandy, J. Christopher Luna, Dallas, Tex., for HSSM # 7. Robert Glenn, Tampa, Fla., for debtor's Directors. Rober..
94-005742RP  CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 1994
The primary issue in these consolidated cases is whether the proposed Southern Water Use Caution Area ("SWUCA") rules of the Southwest Florida Water Management District (the "District") constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Also at issue in the proceedings is the validity of certain portions of the District's existing water use permitting rules contained in Chapter 40D-2, Florida Administrative Code ("F.A.C."), and the "Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications" that the District has adopted by reference in Rule 40D-2.091, F.A.C. Finally, certain policies allegedly utilized by the District in its water use permitting program have been challenged as unpromulgated rules in contravention of Section 120.535, Florida Statutes (1993) ("F.S.").Prop method for calculating min aquifer levels were scientif and statistically sound. Prop method of applying min level was invalid. Existing water use permit rules set forth approp consid but vague. Computer method used as screening tool consti a rule
94-007199RP  GBS GROVES, INC., AND CITRUS GROWERS ASSOCIATES, INC. vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 23, 1994
95-001520  WEST COAST REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 30, 1995
The issue in the case is whether applications filed for water use permits for the South Pasco, Section 21, Cosme-Odessa and Northwest Hillsborough Regional Wellfields meet the requirements set forth in Section 373.223(1), Florida Statutes and Rule 40D-2.301(1), Florida Administrative Code, governing issuance of water use permits, and accordingly, whether the water use permits should be granted by the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Additionally, the West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority asserts that a default permit for the Northwest Hillsborough Regional Wellfield should be granted based on the alleged failure of the Southwest Florida Water Management District to take action on the permit application pursuant to the requirements of Section 120.60(1), Florida Statutes.Criteria met for continued water withdrawal at current levels. Baseline for review is existing condition when application is filed.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer