Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Laura Joyner Nye
Laura Joyner Nye
Visitors: 28
0
Bar #487236(FL)     License for 24 years
Gulf Breeze FL

Are you Laura Joyner Nye? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

82-2314, 82-2316  Warner-Lambert Co. v. Patrick  (1983)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 1983 Citations: 428 So. 2d 718
428 So. 2d 718 (1983) WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, Appellant, v. Anita PATRICK, Appellee. Nos. 82-2314, 82-2316. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 9, 1983. Rehearing Denied April 14, 1983. John J. Hoy of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson, West Palm Beach, for appellant. G. Steven Brannock of Levy, Shapiro, Kneen & Kingcade, Palm Beach, for appellee. DOWNEY, Judge. This non-final appeal involves the validity of an amended complaint adding an additional party defendant, serve..
76-610  Miller v. State  (1977)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 1977 Citations: 343 So. 2d 1292
343 So. 2d 1292 (1977) Samuel MILLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 76-610. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 15, 1977. Rehearing Denied April 18, 1977. Max B. Kogen and Geoffrey C. Fleck, Miami, for appellant. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Sidney M. Pertnoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before HENDRY, C.J., and NATHAN, J., and DREW, E. HARRIS (Ret.), Associate Judge. HENDRY, Chief Judge. Appellant, Samuel Miller, was charged by indictment on Fe..
05-004398  BILL SALTER ADVERTISING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 02, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding is whether a bill board (sign) bearing permit number BB058 (Tag BB058) was illegally modified as envisioned in Florida Administrative Code Rule 14-10.007(2), by having more than 50 percent of its materials replaced within a 24-month period and thus whether the permit for the billboard should be revoked.Petitioner proved that one sign was not repaired with materials that amounted to more than 50 percent of pre-damage value. The second sign was substantially rebuilt with materials that exceeded 50 percent of the pre-damage value.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer