Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Aug. 19, 1996
Do Hilton, Ocala Park and La Quinta have standing (substantial interest) in these proceedings? Has Ocala Park demonstrated reasonable assurance of compliance with the District's requirements for issuance of the remedial/retrofit stormwater management system permit? Did Hilton institute these proceedings for an improper purpose, and if so, may attorney's fees and costs be determined and/or awarded?Retrofit retention pond permit had to comply with all rules but did not have to guarantee every other pond would comply. "Improper purpose" for purposes of attorney's fees was examined in detail and none was found.
