Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Lealand Lane McCharen
Lealand Lane McCharen
Visitors: 58
0
Bar #400343(FL)     License for 41 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Lealand Lane McCharen? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

13-002097F  HERBERT R. SLAVIN, M.D. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 11, 2013
Whether Petitioner, Dr. Herbert R. Slavin, is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs in an amount not exceeding $50,000 pursuant to section 57.111, Florida Statutes (2011).Petition for attorney's fees denied where applicant failed to demonstrate status as a small business party.
12-001705PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs UMESH MADHAV MHATRE, M.D.  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 15, 2012
The issue to be determined is whether Respondent, Umesh Madhav Mhatre, M.D. ("Dr. Mhatre" or "Respondent"), has violated section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2007), and if so, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner did not demonstrate that Respondent violated section 458.331(1((t) by allowing patient to appear in presentations with him.
09-002577BID  MHM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 2009
The issues are as follows: (a) whether Respondent Department of Corrections (the Department) properly determined that there were no responsive proposals to the Request for Proposals entitled Mental Healthcare Services in Region IV, RFP #08-DC-8048 (the RFP); (b) whether the Department's intended award of a contract to provide mental healthcare services to inmates in Region IV to Intervenor Correctional Medical Services, Inc. (CMS), pursuant to Section 287.057(6), Florida Statutes (2008), is unlawful; and (c) whether Petitioner MHM Correctional Services, Inc. (MHM), has standing to challenge the Department's intended award of a contract to CMS pursuant to Section 287.057(6), Florida Statutes (2008).Petitioner did not prove that its proposal was responsive or that the Department improperly decided to negotiate on the best terms and conditions pursuant to Section 287.057(6), Florida Statutes.
96-004694  ROBERT B. CURTIS vs BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 03, 1996
Whether the Petitioner is entitled to be licensed as a Professional Surveyor and Mapper, under Subsections 472.013, 472.015, or 472.041, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1994).Petitioner failed to properly complete application form or provide sufficient information for licensure. License denied.
99-002040  RAYMOND AND JOANN CHAPPELL vs CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES RECOVERY FUND AND JAMES E. MARTIN  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 03, 1999
Whether Petitioners are eligible to recover from the Construction Industries Recovery Fund for the contract(s) between Petitioners and Indian River Homes. 1/Oral contracts predating the inception of a recovery program are not eligible for recovery payment.
96-002187  MARY DONNA LEE vs CLINICAL LABORATORY PERSONNEL  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 08, 1996
Whether Petitioner is qualified for licensure as a Clinical Laboratory Supervisor, pursuant to Section 483.809, Florida Statutes and Rule 59O-5.002, Florida Administrative Code.Applicant did not have appropriate degree; Failed to submit evaluation of transcript by university professor.
94-005085  AIRCRAFT TRADING CENTER, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 1994
The issue for determination is whether Petitioner should be assessed sales and use tax by Respondent, and if so, how much and what penalty, if any, should be assessed.No proof that petitioner entitled to exemption from sales tax/aircraft demonstrations subject to use tax/assessment of sales and use tax.
94-002135  TAN, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 25, 1994
Whether the contested and unpaid portions of the tax, penalty and interest assessment issued against Petitioners as a result of Audit No. 9317210175 should be withdrawn as Petitioners have requested?Petitioners who merely managed and did not own business, were not liable for payment of unpaid taxes generated by business' commercial activities.
94-003605  NANA`S PETROLEUM, INC.; SUN PETROLEUM, INC.; EDILIA PEREZ; AND EMILIO PEREZ vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 07, 1994
The issue presented is whether Petitioners are responsible for unpaid taxes as alleged in the Notices of Final Assessment issued in this cause.Contest of assessments sustained where department relied on hearsay evidence and where portions of assessments extended beyond statute of limitations.
90-004138  INTEGRA CORP. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 1990
The issue is whether the Petition filed by Integra Corporation challenging a tax assessment by the Florida Department of Revenue is time barred.Petition challenging tax assessment dismissed as untimely.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer