Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Jun. 20, 2017
Whether Petitioner, Eugenia Mays, has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that she should not be disqualified from employment in a position involving direct contact with developmentally disabled persons; and, thus, whether Respondent’s intended action to deny Petitioner’s request for an exemption from employment disqualification is an abuse of discretion.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that she was rehabilitated. APD's intended decision to deny the exemption from disqualification was an abuse of discretion.
