welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Leslie T Campbell
Leslie T Campbell
Leslie T Campbell
Visitors: 186
0
Bar #66631(FL)     License for 30 years; Member in Good Standing
West Palm Beach FL

Are you Leslie T Campbell? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-0922  Leslie Hernandez v. Tommy Ford, in his official capacity as Sheriff Bay County, Florida  (2019)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 2019
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D18-922 _ LESLIE HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. TOMMY FORD, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Bay County, Florida, Appellee. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. James B. Fensom, Judge. January 16, 2019 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WETHERELL and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _ Marie A. Mattox of Marie A. Mattox, P.A., T..
16-1863  LAWRENCE WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA  (2017)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 14, 2017
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LAWRENCE WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-1863 [December 14, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Samantha Schosberg Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50- 2014-CF-002167-AXXX-MB. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allen R. Geese..
5D16-3203  Orlando Harris v. State  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 24, 2016
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ORLANDO HARRIS, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D16-3203 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _/ Opinion filed October 28, 2016 Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Orlando Harris, Trenton, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Marjorie Vincent-Tripp Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Responden..
5D16-1952  Julius E. Black v. State  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 24, 2016
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JULIUS ERWING BLACK, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-1952 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed October 28, 2016 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge. Julius Erwin Black, Wewahitchka, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Samuel Perrone, Assistant Attorney General, Dayto..
  Flash Bonded Storage Co., Inc. v. Ades  (1943)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 1943 Citations: 12 So. 2d 164, 152 Fla. 482
The petitioner, Flash Bonded Storage Co., Inc., was defendant in the civil court of record and appellant in the circuit court; the respondent, Gertrude Ades, Plaintiff in the former and appellee in the latter. In our discussion we will refer to them according to their original designation. The plaintiff was awarded a verdict in the trial court and the judgment was affirmed on appeal. We are extending a petition to review the proceedings by certiorari. This court should be chary of the exercise of..
  Bice v. City of Haines City  (1940)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 1940 Citations: 142 Fla. 371, 195 So. 919
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 373 In June, 1939, the City Commission of Haines City adopted a resolution authorizing its City Attorney to foreclose the City's liens acquired for nonpayment of taxes and special assessments on certain parcels of property located within the limits of the City. The appellant as complainant brought this suit to restrain the City Commissioners from carrying out ..
  Bice v. City of Haines City  (1940)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 1940 Citations: 142 Fla. 371, 195 So. 919
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 373 In June, 1939, the City Commission of Haines City adopted a resolution authorizing its City Attorney to foreclose the City's liens acquired for nonpayment of taxes and special assessments on certain parcels of property located within the limits of the City. The appellant as complainant brought this suit to restrain the City Commissioners from carrying out ..
  Bice v. City of Haines City  (1940)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 1940 Citations: 142 Fla. 371, 195 So. 919
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 373 In June, 1939, the City Commission of Haines City adopted a resolution authorizing its City Attorney to foreclose the City's liens acquired for nonpayment of taxes and special assessments on certain parcels of property located within the limits of the City. The appellant as complainant brought this suit to restrain the City Commissioners from carrying out ..
  Burdine v. Sewell  (1926)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 1926
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 377 STATEMENT. Prior to June 23, 1899, Fort Dallas Land Company, a corporation, was the owner of Lots numbered One (1) and Two (2) of Block One Hundred Twenty-two (122) North, in the City of Miami. These lots had a frontage to the North on Twelfth Street. Lot One, being a corner lot, had also a frontage on Avenue C to the East. *Page 378 According to the offic..
  Price v. Sou. Home Ins. Co.  (1930)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 1930 Citations: 100 Fla. 338, 129 So. 748
H. T. Nelson owned Lot Number 98 on the north side of Thirty-fifth Street North in Belvediere Subdivision, St. Petersburg, Florida. The size of the lot was forty feet front by one hundred and thirty-five feet deep. There were located on the lot one five-room bungalow on the south end and a three-room bungalow and garage on the north end. The garage was connected with the three-room bungalow by a narrow lattice in the form of an arch. The distance which separated the small building from the garage..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer