FL Lawyers | Linda A. Wagner -- eLawyers

16-3703 GELRAY M. GAINEY & ANTONISHIA L. FULLER - GAINEY v. LARSON COMMUNITIES, L L C (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 02, 2018

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT GELRAY M. GAINEY and ANTONISHIA ) L. FULLER-GAINEY, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-3703 ) LARSON COMMUNITIES, LLC, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 2, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Richard A. Nielson, Judge. Karmika V. Rubin of The Law Offices of K. V. Rubin, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellants. George L. Hayes, III, ..

02-2390 Economou v. Pepe (2004)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: May 18, 2004

Supreme Judicial Court.the evidence presented in the state court proceeding.2, The statutory rape counts for which appellant was convicted, were based only on the allegation that appellant had engaged in, intercourse with Martha.Commonwealth v. Caracciola, 569 N.E.2d 774, 777 (Mass. 1991).

01-2056 Lattimore v. Dubois (2002)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Nov. 14, 2002

We are unable to say that appellate counsel's failure to raise this theory on appeal means that his performance was constitutionally deficient, 9, Brenda Lucas, although not her husband, testified to seeing Linda with Lattimore at the time he approached the car and emptied his revolver.

01-2494 Lynes v. Hall (2002)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Oct. 23, 2002

Selya and Lipez, Circuit Judges.Thomas J. Lynes on brief pro se.Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Bureau, on brief for appellee.October 22, 2002, Per Curiam.district court is affirmed.

19-1484 Primarque Products Co., Inc. v. Williams W. & Witt's Prod. Co. (2002)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Mar. 05, 2002

Anthony Mazza on brief pro se.This appeal is controlled by our decision in Currie.if any, of a forthcoming Supreme Court Saffold decision.1 Mazza certified that he mailed his habeas petition on July, 27, 1999. It was actually filed in the district court on August, 2, 1999.

01-2288 Nadeau v. Matesanz (2002)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Apr. 30, 2002 Citations: 289 F.3d 13

, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit., Heard April 4, 2002. Therefore, Nadeau's argument that the Appeals Court's affirmance of the trial court's instruction was an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent must fail.5 See 28 U.S.C. 2254(d)(1). 725, 88 L. Ed. 2d 814 (1986).

01-2272 Suboh v. Borgioli (2002)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Aug. 01, 2002 Citations: 298 F.3d 81

at 140, and that, as the case was presented by Suboh, a reasonable person in Murphy's position would have known that his release of Sofia into the Kandys' custody violated that right, id. 274 F.3d at 23-24. The denial of summary judgment as to Borgioli's claim of qualified immunity is affirmed.

00-2364 Barresi v. Maloney (2002)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jul. 23, 2002 Citations: 296 F.3d 48

296 F.3d 48, William A. BARRESI, II Petitioner, Appellant, v.Michael J. MALONEY, Respondent, Appellee. 509 (holding that the claims advanced by a habeas petitioner before the state's highest court must be the substantial equivalent of those raised in his or her federal habeas petition).

19-1687 Tacuri-Tacuri v. Barr (2002)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jun. 17, 2002 Citations: 293 F.3d 19

For one thing, counsel reversed course before Gisleson testified. In light of these precedents, we are unable to sustain the district court's conclusion that Saferian runs contrary to Strickland (and, thus, that the Appeals Court's decision is contrary to settled Supreme Court case law).

Linda A. Wagner