813 So. 2d 1065 (2002) TERRI VAN WINKLE, P. A., Appellant, v. Barbara JOHNSTON and Keith Johnston, Appellees. No. 1D01-1324. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 22, 2002. *1066 Fred M. Johnson and William D. Horgan of Fuller, Johnson & Farrell, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. Marsha L. Lyons of Lyons and Farrar, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. Appellant Terri Van Winkle, P.A. challenges a final order denying its claim to a setoff for the uninsured motorist b..

963 So. 2d 356 (2007) Teresa Lynn WILLS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 5D07-1088. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. August 24, 2007. Teresa L. Wills, Ocala, pro se. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent. MONACO, J. The petitioner, Teresa Lynn Wills, seeks certiorari review of an order of the trial court denying her motion pursuant to rule 3.800(c), Florida Rules of Crimi..

325 So. 2d 479 (1975) Laura BROOKS, Appellant, v. SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, a Special Tax District d/b/a Memorial Hospital, et al., Appellees. No. 74-213. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 19, 1975. Rehearing and Certification Denied February 4, 1976. Jeanne Heyward, and Harold West, of Meltzer, West, Friesner & Goldman, Miami, for appellant. Rex Conrad of Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees South Broward Hospital District and Continental..

In an administrative complaint dated July 3, 1990, the Department of Professional Regulation (DPR) alleges that Respondent violated Section 458.331(l)(m) and (t), F.S., by failing to keep written medical records justifying a course of treatment, and by gross or repeated malpractice or the failure to practice medicine with that level of care, skill and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances. More specifically, the complaint alleges that in his treatment of "Patient #1", Nabil Hilwa, M.D. failed to document in his patient's records the patient's difficulty urinating and the need for a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and that he mislabeled patient #1's adenocarcinoma. The complaint also specifically alleges that Dr. Hilwa inappropriately diagnosed patient #1's condition because the emphasis in March 1985 should have been on the patient's nodule and a diagnosis of prostate cancer, either by transrectal or transperineal biopsy, and not on the TURP, and that Respondent should have performed an acid phosphatase and a prostatic specific antigen on patient #1. The issues for disposition are whether those violations occurred and, if so, what discipline is appropriate.Failure to perform biopsy and diagnose prostate cancer not deviation from standard of care. Medical records justified course of care

The central issue in this case is whether the Department of Environmental Regulation (Department) should grant a dredge and fill permit which has been requested by the Respondent, William R. Cullen (Applicant). That proposed permit has been opposed by the Petitioners (who will be referred to collectively as Petitioners for convenience sake).Conditions set forth in Intent to Issue inadequate to offset adverse affects expected. Applicant failed to show quality standards met or public interest

The Petitioner, P & M Transit Company, Inc., d/b/a Jim Walker's Yamaha (hereinafter "Walker") filed an application to relocate its Yamaha dealership. A protest to the application was filed by the Respondent, Suzuki of Hamilton, Inc., d/b/a Daytona Yamaha, U.S.A. (hereinafter "Hamilton"). The basic issue in this case is whether the Walker application should be denied. Underlying issues are (a) whether Section 320.642, Florida Statutes (1987), applies to relocations of existing dealerships and, if so, (b) whether the existing dealers ". . . are providing adequate representation in the community or territory. . . ." (The parties stipulated that there is no issue in this case regarding breach of the dealer agreement by a dealer.) At the hearing, Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. (hereinafter "Yamaha"), presented the testimony of John Donaldson, an expert in the area of motorcycle dealer network analysis, and offered exhibits 1 through 21, all of which were received into evidence. Hamilton presented the testimony of Alec Mobbs and offered into evidence exhibits A through G. The transcript of the hearing was filed on January 4, 1989, and thereafter Yamaha and Hamilton filed timely proposed recommended orders containing proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The parties' proposals have been carefully considered during the formulation of this recommended order. All findings of fact proposed by the parties are specifically addressed in the attached appendix.Section 320.642 applies to dealer relocation in same area; evidence insufficient to show inadequate representation