Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Lisa Livezey Comingore
Lisa Livezey Comingore
Visitors: 38
0
Bar #822221(FL)    
Tallahassee FL

Are you Lisa Livezey Comingore? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

09-005211  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs VICTOR HARRIS, D/B/A VICTOR'S ROOFING CO., INC., OF THE FLORIDA KEYS  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 22, 2009
Whether Respondent committed the offenses alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Roofing contractor, who obtained the requisite permit and inspections but did not do deficient drywall work, is not guilty of the charges in the Administrative Complaint.
09-005522  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs STUART C. WINSTON, D/B/A BACK BAY HOMES  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2009
The issue is whether Respondent violated Subsections 489.129(1)(g)2., (j), and (m), Florida Statutes (2005),1 by allegedly engaging in financial mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of contracting that causes financial harm to a customer, abandoning a construction project, or committing misconduct or incompetence in the practice of contracting.Contractor who rew $84,655 in loan procees and did no work is guilty of mismanagement, misconduct, abandonment, and subject to fine of $3000 and $61,747.72 restitution.
09-002123  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs JOHN WILLIAM BARKER, JR., D/B/A EPIC BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT CORP.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 20, 2009
Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent’s license to practice contracting, license number CGC 060878, based on violations of Subsection 489.129(1), Florida Statutes (2005)1, as charged in the three-count Administrative Complaint filed against Respondent in this proceeding. Whether Respondent violated Subsection 489.129(1)(g)2., Florida Statutes (Count I) by committing mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of contracting that causes financial harm to a customer; Subsection 489.129(1)(j), Florida Statutes (Count II) by abandoning a construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under contract as a contractor, and Subsection 489.129(1)(m), Florida Statutes (Count III) by committing incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting. And, if so, what discipline should be imposed, pursuant to Section 489.129, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G4-17.002.Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed mismanagement and abandoned the job while constructing the house. Recommend a fine, restitution; suspension.
08-005481  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs THOMAS GEPFRICH, D/B/A ARIZEN HOMES, INC.  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 31, 2008
The issue in this case is whether Respondent failed to include his professional license number on contractual documents, committed mismanagement or misconduct in the performance of contracting services, abandoned construction projects, and was incompetent or mismanaged work he performed.Respondent violated provisions of the Florida Statutes justifying suspension of license and monetary penalty.
08-005456PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs RICHARD H. LINDLEY D/B/A HCL, INC.  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 31, 2008
The issues in this case are whether Respondent, Richard Lindley, committed the offenses alleged in a four-count Administrative Complaint filed with Petitioner, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, on March 20, 2008, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent is guilty of abandonment of a project and committing incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting. Respondent failed to complete the re-roofing project.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer