welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Lisa Marie Bort
Lisa Marie Bort
Lisa Marie Bort
Visitors: 106
0
Bar #119074(FL)     License for 10 years
Palm Harbor FL

Are you Lisa Marie Bort? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  State, Ex Rel. v. Harvey  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 13, 1936 Citations: 125 Fla. 742, 170 So. 153
The pleadings and statute involved are stated in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice BUFORD. *Page 743 Chapter 17257, Acts of 1935, provides for licensing and regulating as well as for taxing defined machines commonly called "slot machines" in the several counties of this State; and the provision of the statute that after the polling of a stated vote in any county at a general election, no such machines shall be licensed to operate in such county, is not an unlawful delegation of legislative powe..
  State, Ex Rel. v. Harvey  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 13, 1936 Citations: 125 Fla. 742, 170 So. 153
The pleadings and statute involved are stated in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice BUFORD. *Page 743 Chapter 17257, Acts of 1935, provides for licensing and regulating as well as for taxing defined machines commonly called "slot machines" in the several counties of this State; and the provision of the statute that after the polling of a stated vote in any county at a general election, no such machines shall be licensed to operate in such county, is not an unlawful delegation of legislative powe..
  Dupree v. Dupree  (1947)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 28, 1947 Citations: 158 Fla. 439, 28 So. 2d 907
Appeal brings for review decree of the Chancellor entered subsequent to the going down of our mandate issued pursuant to our opinion and judgment in DuPree v. DuPree, 156 Fla. 457 , 23 So. 2d 554 . In our opinion and judgment, supra , we determined in effect that (based on the findings of fact by the Court below, which we affirmed) the wife was entitled to a decree awarding her an equity in the estate of the husband as of the date of the filing of the bill for divorce. Section 59.34 Fla. Statutes..
  Tomasello, Jr. v. Murphy  (1930)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 03, 1930 Citations: 100 Fla. 132, 129 So. 328
The bill of complaint in this case alleges that Murphy, by and through his agent, Woods, entered into a certain contract with Pinner for the purchase and sale of a certain parcel of real estate owned by Pinner. It is alleged that the title to this real estate was clouded and, therefore, the parties agreed to place the contract for the purchase and sale, together with a warranty deed to the property from Pinner to Murphy and check from Murphy to Pinner in the amount of One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dol..
  State, Ex Rel. v. Harvey  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 13, 1936 Citations: 125 Fla. 742, 170 So. 153
The pleadings and statute involved are stated in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice BUFORD. *Page 743 Chapter 17257, Acts of 1935, provides for licensing and regulating as well as for taxing defined machines commonly called "slot machines" in the several counties of this State; and the provision of the statute that after the polling of a stated vote in any county at a general election, no such machines shall be licensed to operate in such county, is not an unlawful delegation of legislative powe..
  Hunt v. Commissioners Everglades Drain. Dist.  (1948)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 19, 1948 Citations: 160 Fla. 955, 37 So. 2d 534
The plaintiff by his bill alleged title in himself to certain lands by virtue of a deed from the Trustees of the Internal *Page 956 Improvement Fund of the State of Florida dated the 24th day of July, A.D., 1947, and filed for record, said deed having been issued by authority of Section 192.38, F.S. 1941, F.S.A., conveying lands which had reverted to the State of Florida by reason of non-payment of taxes thereon. Plaintiff in his bill charged that the defendant, Board of Commissioners of Everglad..
  The City of Miami Beach v. Ocean Inland Co.  (1941)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 13, 1941
In the chancery court a bill was filed against the City of Miami Beach to enjoin the municipality from enforcing the provisions of a zoning ordinance against certain property, which will be described later in this opinion, and from a decree in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed. The matter has been presented here by counsel for the respective parties and the Court has heard argument of amici curiae, two in number, representing other owners of property, similarly situated. In the cours..
  Damico v. State  (1943)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 21, 1943 Citations: 153 Fla. 850, 16 So. 2d 43
Appellant was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, to wit: grand larceny. The first question we consider is whether there was error in denying an application for a commission to take the testimony of a nonresident witness to support a plea of alibi. The information was filed September 22, 1942. December 5th, following, a motion to quash was filed. December 8th, appellant was arraigned. The case was set for trial on January 12th and on January 5th the application for ..
  Damico v. State  (1943)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 21, 1943 Citations: 153 Fla. 850, 16 So. 2d 43
Appellant was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, to wit: grand larceny. The first question we consider is whether there was error in denying an application for a commission to take the testimony of a nonresident witness to support a plea of alibi. The information was filed September 22, 1942. December 5th, following, a motion to quash was filed. December 8th, appellant was arraigned. The case was set for trial on January 12th and on January 5th the application for ..
  The City of Miami Beach v. Ocean Inland Co.  (1941)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 13, 1941
In the chancery court a bill was filed against the City of Miami Beach to enjoin the municipality from enforcing the provisions of a zoning ordinance against certain property, which will be described later in this opinion, and from a decree in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed. The matter has been presented here by counsel for the respective parties and the Court has heard argument of amici curiae, two in number, representing other owners of property, similarly situated. In the cours..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer