Miami-Dade FL Employment and labor and Litigation Lawyers

15-000130CON CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA HEALTH SYSTEM NONPROFIT CORPORATION, D/B/A CLEVELAND CLINIC HOSPITAL vs PLANTATION GENERAL HOSPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A PLANTATION GENERAL HOSPITAL AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 08, 2015

Whether Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10235, filed by Plantation General Hospital Limited Partnership, d/b/a Plantation General Hospital (PGH) to establish a 200-bed replacement, acute care hospital in Davie, Broward County, Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA or Agency) acute care District 10, satisfies, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule review criteria.Due to the physical constraints of its existing facility and other factors, Plantation General Hospital established the need for its proposed replacement hospital. Impact on competitors not sufficient to warrant denial.

99-002534 CAROLE A. CLARK vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF STATE GROUP INSURANCE (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 09, 1999

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner is entitled to health insurance coverage for installation of temporary and permanent dental crowns under Florida’s State Employees’ Group Health Self Insurance Plan.Petitioner is not entitled to payment for dental crowns because the state insurance plan expressly excludes coverage for crowns and crowns not medically necessary for temporomandibular joint dysfunction.

98-003239 CATHARINA M. STOECKLIN vs DIVISION OF STATE GROUP INSURANCE (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 16, 1998

The issue in this case is whether the Petitioner is entitled to have her bills paid for medical services rendered to her by Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, on January 12, 1997, through January 16, 1997, by the State of Florida, Group Health Self Insurance Plan.Department failed to prove that insured took too many Tylenol with the intent to hurt herself. Therefore, the Department had no basis to exclude coverage for insured`s treatment.

97-002149CVL PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.; PHARMACEUTICAL RESOURCES, INC.; QUAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; AND PRX DISTRIBUTORS vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 08, 1997

The issue is whether the petitioner companies should be placed on the convicted vendor list.Section 287.133(3)(e)2.f., F.S., requires ALJ to adopt parties' stipulation, agreed settlement or consent order.

93-003996 ALTHEA M. LEWIS vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 20, 1993

Whether Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice in violation of Sections 760.10(1), Florida Statutes.Handicap/sex discrimination no evidence of such discrim & evid did not show back problem to be handicap.

94-005405CVL UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 28, 1994

Should Petitioners be placed on the convicted vendor list maintained by the Respondent? See Section 287.133, Florida Statutes.Parties stipulated that it would not be in the public interest to place petitioner on convicted vendor list so found.

91-007714 UNION TRUCKING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 27, 1991

The ultimate issue is whether the Petitioner's application for designation as a Minority Business Enterprise should be approved. In the instant case, the factual dispute centers on the independence of the applicant given its financial and other relationships with a non-MBE business.Corporation denied Minority Business Enterprise status because of close affiliations between White Female 49% owner and 51% Black Male owner and the father of White Female and former employer of Black Male.

92-004786CVL DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES vs KINNETT DAIRIES, INC. (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 06, 1992

The Issue for consideration is this matter is whether the Respondent, Kinnett Dairies, Inc., should be placed on the State of Florida's convicted vendors list because of its conviction on January 9, 1990 for "making false statements to a federal agency."Vendor convicted in Federal and State Court of Felony not to go on Convicted vendors list if mitigation raising presumption of public interest is not rebutted.

Lorelei Jane Van Wey