Miami-Dade FL Lawyers | Lorenzo J Palomares -- eLawyers

08-1800 United States v. Cintrón-Echautegui (2010)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Apr. 14, 2010

, According to the PSI Report, Las Avispas purveyed an assortment of drugs, including crack cocaine (cocaine base), heroin, and marijuana. United States v. Green, 426 F.3d 64, 66 (1st Cir.2005);, The sentencing court must determine drug quantity only by a preponderance of the evidence.

03-1393 United States v. Ferrario-Pozzi (2004)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: May 12, 2004

368 F.3d 5, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v.Roberto FERRARIO-POZZI, Defendant, Appellant. see also United States v. Hurley, 63 F.3d 1, 23 (1st Cir.1995)(appeal does not deprive district court of jurisdiction to amend existing order of forfeiture to include substitute assets).

06-1400 United States v. Rodriguez-Duran (2007)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Nov. 21, 2007 Citations: 507 F.3d 749

, The statement at issue here made no explicit reference to any defendant other than Morelis and Tejeiro, and Rodríguez-Durán and Cabello point only to prejudicial inferences the jury could have drawn from the statement in light of other evidence presented at trial., Vega Molina, 407 F.3d at 522.

01-2394 United States v. Burgos-Chaparro (2002)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Oct. 23, 2002 Citations: 309 F.3d 50

Not only did Burgos after warnings agree to having Hernandez represent him and co-defendant Lopez in their related cases, but the potential conflict was negated on the spot by Lopez's decision to have Rivera supplant Hernandez as Lopez's counsel in No. 99-308. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984).

03-1636 United States v. Melendez-De-Jesus (2004)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Mar. 30, 2004

plea agreement, eliminating the firearms charge, might be possible. Three months elapsed.1, This unsworn statement, dated December 5, 2001, was submitted, to the court on May 29, 2002, with a motion for reconsideration of, the court's denial of defendant's request to withdraw his plea.appellant.

05-1637 Puerto Rico Ports v. Umpierre-Solares (2006)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jul. 27, 2006 Citations: 456 F.3d 220

Defendants argue that the removed action was within the district court's admiralty jurisdiction because the Contract relates to the removal and disposal of La Isla Nena marine peril [of which the Corps] had demand[ed] removal . 347, 24 L. Ed. 2d 371 (1969)); Laws Ann., Inc., 215 F.3d at 175.

05-1121 United States v. Hernandez (2006)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Apr. 06, 2006 Citations: 443 F.3d 138

-6-, Gorbea found someone who knew when the container was due to arrive. district judge in this case assumed the credibility of the evidence F.3d at 485-86. Hernández has no claim that application to his motion of the three-, year time limit in Rule 33(b)(1) would be unjust or impracticable

04-2086 Disabled Americans v. Ferries del Caribe (2005)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Apr. 26, 2005 Citations: 405 F.3d 60

405 F.3d 60, DISABLED AMERICANS FOR EQUAL ACCESS, INC., Plaintiff, Eduardo Umpierre, Plaintiff, Appellant, v.FERRIES DEL CARIBE, INC., Defendant, Appellee., LIPEZ, Circuit Judge., 11, We turn, then, to Ferries' argument that Title III of the ADA does not apply to foreign-flagged ships.

04-1366 United States v. Rosado-Sierra (2005)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jul. 20, 2005

was not raised in the district court.seized currency and drug trafficking.U.S. Currency, 965 F.2d 868, 877 (10th Cir.legitimate business Rosado Construction.issue of material fact. United States v. Funds in Amount of $30, 670.00, 403 F.3d, 448, 469 (7th Cir.motion for summary judgment is affirmed.

06-2722 United States v. Bristol-Martir (2009)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jun. 26, 2009

United States v. Carlos Cruz, 352 F.3d 499, 502 (1st Cir. Even if we were to disregard the March 31, 2005 planning meeting between Canino and Bristol, the events of April 6, 2005 provide sufficient evidence from which the jury could infer Santiago's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Lorenzo J Palomares