Leon FL and Government Lawyers | Lynn Miyamoto Hoshihara -- eLawyers

SC14-1603 (2015)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 2015

Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC14-1603 _ FLORIDA BANKERS ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellant, vs. FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellees. _ No. SC14-1618 _ ROBERT REYNOLDS, Appellant, vs. FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellees. [October 15, 2015] LABARGA, C.J. In these consolidated cases, the Florida Bankers Association (FBA) and Robert Reynolds appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit, in and for Leon County, validatin..

15-004711GM CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2015

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Wellness Way Area Plan Map and Text Amendment to the Lake County Comprehensive Plan (“Remedial Amendment”) adopted through Lake County Ordinance No. 2016-1 is “in compliance,” as defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.

15-005278GM CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 18, 2015

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Wellness Way Area Plan Map and Text Amendment to the Lake County Comprehensive Plan (“Remedial Amendment”) adopted through Lake County Ordinance No. 2016-1 is “in compliance,” as defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.

16-000628GM CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 04, 2016

Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.

17-002678FC MARION COUNTY, POLK COUNTY, AND SEMINOLE COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 10, 2017

Determination, after remand, of an appropriate award for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by Petitioners in consolidated appeals.Final Order after Remand awarding appellants their attorneys' fees and costs incurred in the appeal pursuant to the parties' stipulation.

12-000891RX OKALOOSA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 12, 2012

This is a rule challenge brought pursuant to section 120.56, Florida Statutes,1/ to existing Florida Administrative Code rules 63G-1.011, 63G-1.013, 63G-1.016, and 63G-1.017, (the "Challenged Rules"), adopted by the Department of Juvenile Justice (Department). At issue is whether some or all of the challenged rules constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined by section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes. The challengers allege the rules are invalid on three grounds: The rules modify the dividing line between county and state responsibility for the costs of secure juvenile detention from "final court disposition" to "commitment"; The rules fail to implement the requirement that the counties are only responsible for the "actual costs" of secure juvenile detention for the period of time prior to final court disposition; The rules inappropriately utilize an appropriations bill to modify the amount Petitioners are required to pay for predisposition costs under section 985.686, Florida Statutes.Department of Juvenile Justice's rules governing cost sharing between state and counties for secure juvenile detention are invalid.

12-002795F OKALOOSA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2012

The issue to be determined is the amount of attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded to Petitioners pursuant to section 120.595(3), Florida Statutes (2012).Petitioners are entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs incurred in their challenge to an existing rule.

Lynn Miyamoto Hoshihara