Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Marc Anthony Drexler
Marc Anthony Drexler
Visitors: 83
0
Bar #487058(FL)     License for 23 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Marc Anthony Drexler? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

14-004018  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs GRANDPA JOHN'S GEORGIA BBQ AND SOUL FOOD, LLC  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 25, 2014
The issue is whether Respondent is guilty of the violation described in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what is the appropriate penalty.Food establishment held perishable good items at improper temperature; $250.00 fine imposed.
13-004636  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs UMAMI  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 25, 2013
Whether Respondent, a licensed public food service establishment, violated chapter 509, Florida Statutes, by misrepresenting the identity of a food to the patrons of the establishment, as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent misrepresented a food or food product in violation of section 509.292(1).
14-002557  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs CLINTON GREEN, D/B/A CLINTON GREEN  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2014
The issue in this case is whether Respondent was operating a public food service establishment without a license, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent operated mobile food service establishment without a license. Fine of $500 is recommended.
13-004979  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs NEW ROSEAU RESTAURANT  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 27, 2013
Whether New Roseau Restaurant (New Roseau), a licensed restaurant, committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against New Roseau.Division established, by clear and convincing evidence, two statutory violations.
13-004682  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs KOY WAN HIBACHI BUFFET  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 06, 2013
Whether the allegations in the Administrative Complaint filed by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants (Petitioner), against Koy Wan Hibachi Buffet (Respondent) are correct.Food Code violations warrant penalty.
13-004683  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs SARAH GREEK VILLAGE DELI  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 06, 2013
Whether Respondent committed the violations set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what is the appropriate penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner committed two Basic violations, two Intermediate violations, and one High Priority violation. Recommend administrative fine at the lower end of the range, as all were first offenses.
13-003846  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs LENIN'S  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2013
Whether Lenin's, a licensed restaurant, committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against Lenin's.The Division established, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent had violated several Food Code provisions. Recommend fine.
13-003613  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs DOMINOS PIZZA  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 17, 2013
Whether Respondent violated food safety standards established by section 509.032, Florida Statutes, and the implementing rules as charged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the appropriate sanctions.Respondent violated standards of the Food Code, but extraordinary efforts to remedy violations supported significant reductions in fines.
13-003848  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs RICHIE CHEESESTEAK  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2013
Whether Respondent violated food safety standards established by section 509.032, Florida Statutes, and the implementing rules as charged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated the Food Code as charged in the administrative complaint; administrative fines were appropriate.
13-003384  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs HOLLAND APARTMENTS  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 10, 2013
Petitioner proved that Respondent apartment complex was in violation of agency rules. Mitigating circumstances existed as units were unoccupied and not held out for rent.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer